Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 3]

Kerala High Court

Joykutty vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 19 August, 2009

Author: M.Sasidharan Nambiar

Bench: M.Sasidharan Nambiar

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 2714 of 2009()


1. JOYKUTTY, AGED 54 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. G.RAJAN, AGED 56 YEARS,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.V.DILEEP

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :19/08/2009

 O R D E R
              M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.

              ------------------------------------------
               CRL.M.C.NO.2714 OF 2009
              ------------------------------------------

              Dated        19th     August       2009


                           O R D E R

Petitioner was convicted and sentenced for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Petitioner filed Crl.A.209/2009 before Sessions court, Kollam challenging the conviction and sentence. He filed Crl.M.P.1703/2009 to suspend the sentence. Under Annexure-B order, Sessions Judge suspended the sentence on conditions. One of the conditions was to deposit 1/5th of the amount covered by the dishonoured cheque, within one month from 18/6/2009. Petitioner did not deposit that amount. This petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the said condition.

2. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner was heard.

3. Under Annexure-A judgment, petitioner was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.9,00,000/- in addition to the substantive sentence. If that sentence is to be suspended, learned Sessions Judge CRMC 2714/09 2 was justified in directing the petitioner to deposit 1/5th of that amount. I find no reason to interfere with that order. If case of the petitioner is that he cannot deposit the amount, he is at liberty to approach the Sessions Judge to dispose the appeal expeditiously.

Petition is disposed.

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE.

uj.