Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Hardev vs The State Of Haryana on 27 February, 2023

Bench: S. Ravindra Bhat, Dipankar Datta

     ITEM NO.51                              COURT NO.14                      SECTION II-B

                                 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F           I N D I A
                                         RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)                        No(s).    12395/2022

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15-11-2022
     in CRM-M No. 44900/2022 passed by the High Court Of Punjab &
     Haryana At Chandigarh)

     HARDEV                                                                   Petitioner(s)

                                                    VERSUS

     THE STATE OF HARYANA & ANR.                        Respondent(s)
     ( IA No. 197799/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
     JUDGMENT)

     Date : 27-02-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA

     For Petitioner(s)               Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh, AOR

     For Respondent(s)               Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh, DAG
                                     Mr. Alok Sangwan, Sr. Adv.
                                     Mr. Rovin Singh Solanki, Adv.
                                     Mr. Chetan Jadon, Adv.
                                     Dr. VPS Jadon, Adv.
                                     Ms. Hemalata Singh, Adv.
                                     Mr. Harsh Vardhan Rajawat, Adv.
                                     Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR

                                    Mr. Aman Preet Singh Rahi, Adv.
                                    Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, AOR
                                    Mr. Puneet Thakur, Adv.

                          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                             O R D E R

While issuing notice this Court had directed the petitioner to report to the investigating officer on two consecutive dates.

Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by Harshita Uppal Date: 2023.02.27

Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the 17:42:49 IST Reason: petitioner has in fact complied with the directions. 1 Having regard to these circumstances and the nature of the offence alleged against him, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail and is accordingly directed to be enlarged on bail subject to such conditions as the Trial Court may impose.

The petition is disposed of on the above terms. All pending applications are disposed of.

   (HARSHITA UPPAL)                            (MATHEW ABRAHAM)
SR. PERSONAL ASSISTANT                        COURT MASTER (NSH)




                                2