Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 21]

Chattisgarh High Court

State Of Chhattisgarh vs Heeralal Yadav 21 Wa/116/2018 State Of ... on 14 March, 2018

Bench: Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Sharad Kumar Gupta

                                      1



                                                                           NAFR
          HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                             WA No. 114 of 2018

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Public Works,
   Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station
   Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector, Janjgir-Champa, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue). Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa,
   Chhattisgarh.

4. The Executive Engineer Public Works Department, District Janjgir-Champa,
   Chhattisgarh.
                                                             ---- Appellants

                                   Versus

 Shakuntala Yadav D/o Bodh Ram Yadav, Aged About 52 Years R/o Sukul Para,
  Tahsil Pamgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
                                                          ---- Respondent

with HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WA No. 115 of 2018

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Public Works, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector, Janjgir-Champa, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue). Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Executive Engineer Public Works Department, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

---- Appellants Versus  Heeralal Yadav S/o Late Shri Asharam Yadav Aged About 65 Years R/o Sukul Para Tahsil Pamgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

---- Respondent with HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WA No. 116 of 2018

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Public Works, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2

2. The Collector, Janjgir-Champa, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue). Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Executive Engineer Public Works Department, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

---- Appellants Versus  Uttam Yadav S/o Late Shri Fakir Ram Yadav, Aged About 65 Years R/o Sukul Para, Tahsil Pamgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

---- Respondent with HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WA No. 117 of 2018

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Public Works, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector, Janjgir-Champa, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue). Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Executive Engineer Public Works Department, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

---- Appellants Versus  Vinod Yadav S/o Ayodhya Yadav, Aged About 53 Years R/o Sukul Para, Tahsil Pamgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

---- Respondent with HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WA No. 119 of 2018

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Public Works, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector, Janjgir-Champa, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue). Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Executive Engineer Public Works Department, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

---- Appellants Versus 3  Bharat Yadav S/o Ayodhya Yadav Aged About 75 Years R/o Sukul Para , Tahsil Pamgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

---- Respondent with HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WA No. 123 of 2018

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Public Works, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector, Janjgir-Champa, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue). Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Executive Engineer Public Works Department, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

---- Appellants Versus  Ghyanshyam Yadav S/o S/o Late Fakir Ram Yadav, Aged About 75 Years R/o Sukul Para, Tahsil Pamgarh, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh. .................Petitioner.

---- Respondent with HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WA No. 125 of 2018

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Public Works, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Officer And Police Station Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ...................Respondents

2. The Collector, Janjgir- Champa, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue), Pamgarh, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh.

---- Appellants Versus  Laxmi Prasad Yadav S/o S/o Late Shri Nathu Ram Yadav Aged About 70 Years R/o Sukul Para, Tahsil Pamgarh, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh. ...................Petitioner.

---- Respondent For Appellant/State : Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General.

For Respondent : Shri B.D. Guru, Advocate for respective Respondents.

4

Hon'ble Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order on Board Per Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief Justice 14.03.2018

1. Heard the learned Additional Advocate General and the learned counsel for the Respondents.

2. We see that similar matters have been dismissed through different judgments including the judgment rendered in Writ Appeal 107 of 2018 and connections passed on 26.02.2018. Following the judgment passed in Writ Appeal No.107 of 2018, these writ appeals are dismissed.

                                Sd/-                                                  Sd/-

                    (Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan)                          (Sharad Kumar Gupta)
                            Chief Justice                                          Judge
Brijmohan