Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Rakhee Pramod Bajaj vs Capt. Pramod Kumar Bajaj on 11 January, 2016

Bench: Anil R. Dave, Shiva Kirti Singh, Adarsh Kumar Goel

                                                                              OUT TODAY
     ITEM NO.43                               COURT NO.2                SECTION XIV

                                    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.34658/2015

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/08/2015
     in CMA No.14811/2015 in WP No.368/2015 passed by the High Court of
     Delhi at New Delhi)

     RAKHEE PRAMOD BAJAJ                                                 Petitioner(s)

                                                     VERSUS

     CAPT. PRAMOD KUMAR BAJAJ                      Respondent(s)
     (With appln. for permission to appear and argue in person and
     interim relief and office report)

     Date : 11/01/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

     For Petitioner(s)                  Petitioner-in-person

     For Respondent(s)

                             UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                O R D E R

Application for permission to appear and argue in person is allowed.

Heard the petitioner-in-person. The special leave petition is dismissed. We, however, direct that the maintenance application filed by the petitioner before the concerned court be heard and decided finally at an early date. So far as the closure of the evidence is concerned, as the same has not been challenged, we do not make any observation thereon.

Signature Not Verified

It would be open to the petitioner to challenge the Digitally signed by Sarita Purohit Date: 2016.01.11 15:31:11 IST validity of the said order in appropriate proceedings.

Reason:

(Anita Malhotra) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar