Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Arvind Yadav vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 8 March, 2022

Bench: S. Abdul Nazeer, Krishna Murari

     ITEM NO.3                           COURT NO.7                  SECTION II-C

                              S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                      RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)              No(s).     7024/2021

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06-07-2021
     in BA No. 1416/2021 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi)

     ARVIND YADAV                                                      Petitioner(s)

                                                 VERSUS

     GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI                                             Respondent(s)

     (IA No. 116719/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
     JUDGMENT

IA No. 116728/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 139139/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 116729/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES) Date : 08-03-2022 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sidharth Dave,Sr.Adv.
Ms. Aayushi Agarwal,Adv. Ms. Susy George,Adv.
Ms. Charu Ambwani, AOR Mr. Devashish Chauhan,Adv. Ms. Shachi Mittal,Adv.
Ms. Saumya Gupta,Adv.
Mr. Aditya Vaibhav Singh,Adv. Ms. Aarushi Singh,Adv.
Ms. Jemtiben AO.,Adv.
Ms. Vidhi Thaker,Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. K.M.Nataraj,ASG Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Shailesh Madiyal,Adv. Mr. Vatsal Joshi,Adv.
Mr. Varun Chugh,Adv.
Signature Not Verified
Mr. Sughosh Subramanyam,Adv.
Digitally signed by Anita Malhotra Date: 2022.03.09 16:44:02 IST Reason: 1
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case.
We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
However, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.
Pending applications also stand disposed of.
(ANITA MALHOTRA) (KAMLESH RAWAT) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 2