Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 2]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai

Excel Crop Care Ltd, Mumbai vs Asst Cit Cen Cir 38, Mumbai on 8 December, 2016

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "H" BENCH, MUMBAI

BEFORE SRI B. R. BASKARAN, AM AND SRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM

                  ITA No.2465/Mum/2015
                       (A.Y:2005-06)

M/s. Excel Crop Care Ltd.,     Vs.   The Asst. Commissioner of
13,    Aradhana     Industrial       Income Tax, Central Circle 38
Development      Corporation,        Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Road,
Near     Virwani    Industrial       Mumbai 400 020
Estate, Goregaon (E),
Mumbai 400 063
PAN: AAACW 3810D
         Appellant             ..           Respondent

                  ITA No.2252/Mum/2015
                       (A.Y:2005-06)

The Asst. Commissioner of Vs.        M/s. Excel Crop Care Ltd.,
Income Tax, Central Circle 38        13,    Aradhana    Industrial
Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Road,          Development      Corporation,
Mumbai 400 020                       Near     Virwani   Industrial
                                     Estate, Goregaon (E),
                                     Mumbai 400 063
                                     PAN: AAACW 3810D
         Appellant             ..           Respondent


        Assessee by            ..     Shri Akhilesh Jain, AR
        Revenue by             ..    Shri M. C. Omi Ningshen,
                                     DR


   Date of hearing             ..    08-12-2016
 Date of pronouncement         ..    20 -12 -2016


                           ORDER
PER AMIT SHUKLA, JM:

The aforesaid cross appeals have been filed by the assessee as well as by the Revenue against the impugned order dated 30-01-2015 for the quantum of assessment passed u/s 143(3) read with Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2005-06.

2 ITA No.2465/Mum/2015

2252/Mum/2015 Assessment Year: 2005-06

2. Before us, the learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that the present appeal is arising out of the set aside proceedings in pursuance of order passed u/s 263, dated 26-03-2013 by the learned CIT (Central Circle-3, Mumbai). He pointed out that now, the said order passed by the learned CIT u/s 263 has been set aside by the Tribunal and the order of the AO passed on 30-12- 2010 u/s 143 (3) r. w. s. 147 has been restored. He also placed the copy of the order of the Tribunal passed in ITA No.4237/Mum/2013 dated 06-11-2015. Thus, he submitted that the present appeal has now become infructuous.

3. After considering the aforesaid submissions and perusal of the materials placed on record, we find that the original assessment was completed u/s 143(3) on 26-11-2008. Thereafter, the said assessment was reopened u/s 147 and assessment order was passed u/s 143(3) read with Section 17 on 30-12-2010. Thereafter, the learned CIT in his revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 canceled the said assessment order and directed the Assessing Officer to pass fresh assessment order after considering various issues like disallowance of interest attributable to capital work-in- progress, disallowance in respect of subscription expenses, etc. The said order of the CIT was challenged by the assessee before this Tribunal, wherein the Tribunal vide order dated, 06-11-2015 has quashed/set aside the said order of the learned CIT passed u/s 263 and thereby the assessment order dated 30-12-2010 passed by the Assessing Officer got restored. Once, the order passed u/s 263 itself has been quashed, then the consequent proceedings undertaken u/s 143(3)/263 has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee as well as the appeal of the Revenue both have become infructuous and the same are treated as dismissed.

3 ITA No.2465/Mum/2015

2252/Mum/2015 Assessment Year: 2005-06

4. In the result, both the appeals of the assessee and that of the Revenue are dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 20-12-2016.

                 Sd/-                                                 Sd/-
         (B. R. BASKARAN)                                         (AMIT SHUKLA)
       ACCONTANT MEMBER                                          JUDICIAL MEMBER

     Mumbai, Dated: 20-12-2016
 Lakshmikanta Deka/Sr.PS




 Copy of the Order forwarded to:


1.     The Appellant
2.     The Respondent.
3.     The CIT (A), Mumbai.
4.     CIT
5.     DR, ITAT, Mumbai
6.     Guard file. //True Copy//

                                                                            BY ORDER,

                                                                       Assistant Registrar
                                                                       ITAT, MUMBAI

Sr.       Particulars                                 Date       Initials    Member
No.                                                                          concerned
1         Dictation given on                          16.12.16 LK Deka       JM
2         Draft placed before author                  19.12.16
                                                      20.12.16
3         Draft proposed/placed before the second
          Member
4         Draft discussed/approved by second
          member
5         Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS           22.12.16
6         Kept for pronouncement on                   -
7         File sent to the Bench Clerk                22.11.16
8         Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk
9         Date of dispatch of Order