Himachal Pradesh High Court
Prabha Sarin & Others vs . Lac & Others. on 31 March, 2022
Author: Vivek Singh Thakur
Bench: Vivek Singh Thakur
Prabha Sarin & others Vs. LAC & others.
.
RFAs No. 269 and 270 of 2018 RFA No. 269 of 2018 31.3.2022 Present: Mr.Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate, for the appellants.
Mr.Raju Ram Rahi, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No. 1.
Appellant No. 3 is stated to have expired.
RFA No. 270 of 2018 Mr.Raju Ram Rahi, Deputy Advocate General, for the appellant.
Mr.Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 3, 5, 6 and 8.
Appellant No. 9 is stated to have expired.
RFA No. 269 of 2018 Post admission notice issued to respondents No. 2, 4 and 6 through registered A.D. are still awaited. Report be obtained by next date of hearing.
Consequential steps on account of death of respondent No. 3 have not been taken. Be taken within four weeks.
List after four weeks.
RFA No. 270 of 2018Steps for service of respondents No. 4, 7 and 10 to 12 have not been taken. Be taken within one week. On taking such steps, notice returnable within four weeks be issued to the said respondents.
::: Downloaded on - 31/03/2022 20:16:14 :::CISRespondent No. 9 Indervasha is stated to have .
expired. Therefore, appropriate steps on account of her death also be taken in the meanwhile.
(Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge.
31th March, 2022
(Keshav)
r to
::: Downloaded on - 31/03/2022 20:16:14 :::CIS