Himachal Pradesh High Court
Harish Sahotra vs State Of H.P. Through on 5 May, 2022
Bench: Sabina, Satyen Vaidya
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
ON THE 5th DAY OF MAY, 2022
.
BEFORE
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SABINA
&
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA
CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 2731 of 2022
Between:-
HARISH SAHOTRA ,
S/O SH. ROSHAN LAL,
R/O VILLAGE & P.O. SULIALI,
TEHSIL NURPUR, DISTRICT KANGRA, H.P.
PRESENTLY POSTED AS TGT NON- MEDICAL,
GOVT. MIDDLE SCHOOL PREGRAM,
U/C GOVT. SR. SEC. SCHOOL KILLAR
(PANGI), DISTRICT CHAMBA, H.P.
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS. ...PETITIONER
(BY MR. JAGAT PAL, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. STATE OF H.P. THROUGH
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (EDUCATION)
TO THE GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA-2.
2. DIRECTOR ELEMENTARY EDUCATION,
HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-1.
3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR ELEMENTARY EDUCATION,
CHAMBA, DISTRICT CHAMBA, H.P. ... RESPONDENTS
(BY SH. ASHWANI SHARMA,
ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL)
::: Downloaded on - 05/05/2022 20:07:17 :::CIS
2
This petition coming on for admission this day,
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sabina, passed the following:
.
ORDER
Petitioner has filed the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief:-
"i). That the respondent No. 1 may very kindly be directed to decide the representation dated 28.03.2022 (Annexure P-1) within time bound manner and adjust him to one of the stations of his choice mentioned in the representation as under:
a. Govt. Sr. Sec. School Suliali, District Kangra, H.P. b. Govt. Sr. Sec. School Sadwan, District Kangra, H.P. c. Govt. Sr. Sc. Schol Kukher, District Kangra, H.P. d. Govt. Sr. Sec. School Aundh, District Kangra, H.P. e. Govt. Sr. Sec. School Ladori, District Kangra, H.P."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has completed his normal tenure in the hard/tribal area and is now entitled for his transfer to a soft area, in terms of the transfer policy dated 10th July, 2013.
Representation dated 28.03.2022 (Annexure P-1), moved by ::: Downloaded on - 05/05/2022 20:07:17 :::CIS 3 the petitioner in this regard to the respondents has not been decided so far.
.
3. Learned Additional Advocate General has submitted that the representation moved by the petitioner is not in terms of the transfer policy dated 10th July, 2013.
4. Accordingly, without adverting to the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that in case the petitioner moves a fresh representation to the respondents, in terms of the transfer policy, dated 10 th July, 2013, within a week from today, then respondents shall dispose of the same within two weeks of the receipt of the representation, in accordance with law.
Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(Sabina) Judge (Satyen Vaidya) Judge.
May 05 , 2022 (PK) ::: Downloaded on - 05/05/2022 20:07:17 :::CIS