Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Chattisgarh High Court

Ranjit Kumar Kujur vs State Of Chhattisgarh 11 Wps/6443/2018 ... on 28 September, 2018

Author: P. Sam Koshy

Bench: P. Sam Koshy

                                            1

                                                                                NAFR
                 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

                                WPS No. 6442 of 2018

             Ranjit Kumar Kujur S/o Shri Manual Kujur, Aged About 39 Years,
             Working As Lecturer, (Panchayat) At Govt. Higher Secondary School
             Manoharpur, Thana Block - Shankargarh, District Balrampur
             Chhattisgarh.
                                                                       ---Petitioner
                                            Versus
       1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary Of Panchayat And Rural
          Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur,
          District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
       2. Commissioner Cum Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Naya Raipur,
          District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
       3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Balrampur, District Balrampur
          Chhattisgarh.
                                                                   ---Respondents

For petitioner : Shri Manoj Chauhan, Advocate.

      For State          :     Shri S.P.Kale, Dy.A.G.



                        Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
                                   Order on Board
28/09/2018

1. Learned Counsel for the parties submits that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by the order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions, wherein allowing the petitions, the circular dated 23.4.2016 has been quashed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post.

2

2. In view of the aforesaid submission, since the impugned order or action is based on circular dated 23.4.2016 which stands quashed in the case referred above, the present writ petition also deserves to be allowed with the direction that the petitioner shall also be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service including the services rendered by him on a lower post or on the same post.

3. The writ petition thus stands finally disposed of.

Sd/-


                                                             (P. Sam Koshy)
Sumit                                                            JUDGE