Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

The Principal Commissioner Of Cgst And ... vs Shri Iqbal R. Hingora Director M/S. ... on 27 September, 2018

Author: Riyaz I. Chagla

Bench: M.S. Sanklecha, Riyaz I. Chagla

                           Uday S. Jagtap                                                  468-18-NMA-13=.doc



                                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                             ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                                          NOTICE OF MOTION NO.  468 OF 2018
                                                           IN
                                      CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 121 OF 2015
                                                          WITH
                                      CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 121 OF 2015
                                                             
                           Commissioner of CGST and Central
                           Excise, Daman Commissionerate              .. Applicant 

                                 In the matter between 
                           Commissioner of CGST and Central
                           Excise, Daman Commissionerate                                   .. Appellant 

                                  v/s. 
                           Shri. Iqbal R. Hingora 
                           Director of M/s. Hingora Industries Ltd.                        ..Respondents

Mr. M. Dwivedi for the applicant / orig. appellant Mr. Prabhakar Jadhav for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.J. DATED : 27 th SEPTEMBER, 2018.

P.C.

1. This motion seeks condonation of 840 days delay in taking out this application for setting aside the order dated 10 th December, 2015 passed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master. The order dated 10 th December, 2015 rejected the applicant's appeal for failure to remove office objections in terms of Rule 986 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules.

2. Mr. Dwivedi, learned Counsel appearing in support of the motion, on instructions, seeks to withdraw this motion as well as the Digitally Uday signed by Uday Shivaji Jagtap Shivaji Date:

2018.09.28 1 of 2 Jagtap 11:05:25 +0530 Uday S. Jagtap 468-18-NMA-13=.doc accompanying appeal filed from the order dated 1 st December, 2014 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal).

3. This for the reason that the tax effect involved in the appeal in which this motion is taken out, is less than Rs.50 lakhs and covered by instructions / circular dated 11th July, 2018 issued by the Central Board of Indirect Tax and Customs. The above instructions / Circular directs the Revenue not to file fresh appeals and also withdraw the pending appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs.50 lakhs.

4. Mr. Dwivedi, on instructions of Mr. Sushant Kumar, Additional Commissioner (Legal) CGST & CE, Daman Commissionerate in view of the above instructions / circular, seeks to withdraw this motion as well as the accompanying appeal.

5. Motion is dismissed as withdrawn.

6. In view of the dismissal of the motion, the appeal also dismissed as infructuous.

(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) 2 of 2