Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Govind Rambilasji Sarda And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 16 July, 2019

Author: Mangesh S. Patil

Bench: S. V. Gangapurwala, Mangesh S. Patil

                               (1)                         11-13-33-41




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                   11 WRIT PETITION NO.8460 OF 2019

 RAJARAM TUKARAM KALE AND OTHERS                 ..PETITIONERS

                  VERSUS

 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ..RESPONDENTS
                        ...
 Mr.   Sandeep  B.   Sontakke,   Advocate   for   the
 Petitioners.
 Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondents-State.
 Mr.   Maheshkumar   S.   Sonawane,    Advocate   for
 Respondent No.2.
                                ...
                                 WITH
                   13 WRIT PETITION NO.8462 OF 2019

 DATTATRAYA BHUJANGRAO DESHPANDE AND OTHERS
                                     ..PETITIONERS

                  VERSUS

 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS
                         ...
 Mr.   Sandeep   B.  Sontakke,    Advocate  for  the
 Petitioners.
 Mr. K. B. Jadhavar, AGP for Respondents-State.
 Mr.   Maheshkumar   S.    Sonawane,   Advocate  for
 Respondent No.2 and 3.
                        ...
                         WITH
           33 WRIT PETITION NO.8530 OF 2019

 GOVIND RAMBILASJI SARDA AND OTHERS              ..PETITIONERS

                  VERSUS

 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS
                        ...
 Mr.   Sandeep  B.   Sontakke,   Advocate  for   the


::: Uploaded on - 18/07/2019            ::: Downloaded on - 19/07/2019 00:53:07 :::
                                        (2)                          11-13-33-41



 Petitioners.
 Mr. S. B. Yawalkar, AGP for Respondents-State.
 Mr. V. M. Chate, Advocate for Respondent No.2 and
 3.
                        ...
                         WITH
           41 WRIT PETITION NO.8555 OF 2019

 USHA MADHUKAR SONAR AND OTHERS                           ..PETITIONERS

                  VERSUS

 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS
                        ...
 Mr.   Sandeep  B.   Sontakke,   Advocate  for   the
 Petitioners.
 Mr. S. G. Karlekar, AGP for Respondents-State.
 Mr.   Maheshkumar   S.   Sonawane,   Advocate   for
 Respondent No.2 and 3.
                        ...

                                       CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
                                               MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATED : 16th JULY, 2019. PER COURT:-

1. It is submitted that, petitioners in these writ petitions are awarded certificate of excellent work and advance increments in the year 2007 to 2009. They were given benefit of advance increments and same was also paid. However, now for some of petitioners recovery is claimed and for some of petitioners benefit is not extended. If petitioners are already granted certificate of excellent work in the year 2007, 2008 and 2009, then same cannot be withdrawn retrospectively on the basis of subsequent Government Resolution.
::: Uploaded on - 18/07/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 19/07/2019 00:53:07 :::
(3) 11-13-33-41
2. The same view was taken by us in Writ Petition No.1954 of 2018 with other connected writ petitions under order dated 25.01.2019.
3. The Government Resolution dated 24.08.2017 will have prospective effect and not retrospective and in that case benefit that was accorded to petitioners of excellent work in the year 2007, 2008 and 2009, shall not be withdrawn and if any recovery is made pursuant to the same, same shall be refunded to petitioners.
4. In the light of the above, writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

(MANGESH S. PATIL) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/July-19 ::: Uploaded on - 18/07/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 19/07/2019 00:53:07 :::