Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Pooram Gold vs The Commercial Tax Officer on 24 September, 2014

Author: A.Muhamed Mustaque

Bench: A.Muhamed Mustaque

       

  

   

 
 
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                            PRESENT:

                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

              THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/29TH SRAVANA, 1937

                                   WP(C).No. 24109 of 2015 (K)
                                      ----------------------------

PETITIONER :
---------------------

            POORAM GOLD
            T.C.NO.10/1048/15, AYODHYA BUILDING,
            NEW CHURCH ROAD, THRISSUR-680 001
            REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER ANANDAKUMAR A.N.

            BY ADVS.SMT.S.K.DEVI
                          SRI.SANTHOSH P. ABRAHAM

RESPONDENT(S) :
----------------------------

        1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER
            COMMERCIAL TAXES, 1ST CIRCLE, COMMERCIAL TAX COMPLEX
            POOTHOLE, THRISSUR-680 004.

        2. THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
            COMMERCIAL TAXES, COMMERCIAL TAX COMPLEX, POOTHOLE
            THRISSUR-680 004.

        3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
            COMMERCIAL TAXES, COMMERCIAL TAX COMPLEX, POOTHOLE
            THRISSUR-680 004.

        4. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
            TAX TOWER, KARAMANA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

            R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN

            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
            ON 20-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
            FOLLOWING:


Mn


                                                                        ...2/-

WP(C).No. 24109 of 2015 (K)
----------------------------------------

                                                      APPENDIX

PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :
-------------------------------------

EXT. P1-             TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FORM FOR ON-LINE REGISTRATION
                     NO.320805/DI01/191/2014 DATED 24.9.2014.

EXT. P2-             TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE LOCAL DELIVERY
                     BOOK.

EXT. P3-             TRUE COPY OF THE SHOP INSPECTION REPORT NO.154579.

EXT. P4-             TRUE COPY OF THE FORM NO.1 NO.320805/DI01/191/2014 DATED
                     15.7.2015.

EXT. P5-             TRUE COPY OF THE ANNUAL RETURN FOR 2014-15.

EXT. P6-             TRUE COPY OF COVERING LETTER DATED 15.7.2015 SENT TO THE
                     1ST RESPONDENT.

EXT. P7-             TRUE COPY OF FORM NO.1, NO.320805/DI01/191/2014 DATED 21.7.2015.

EXT. P8-             TRUE COPY OF NOTICE NO.A-2710/15-16 DATED 27.7.2015 ISSUED BY
                     THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXT. P9-             TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 29.7.2015 SENT TO
                     THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS                       :               NIL
-------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                       //TRUE COPY//




                                                                       P.A. TO JUDGE


Mn



               A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J
      ----------------------------------------------------
               W.P.(C).No. 24109 of 2015
      ----------------------------------------------------
     Dated this the 20th day of August, 2015

                          JUDGMENT

The petitioner has applied for registration under KVAT Act. The petitioner has been directed to produce certain documents as per Ext.P8. The petitioner submitted that he has produced all the documents. It appears that the registration has not been granted on account of the fact that certain clarification has been sought by 1st respondent on the instruction of the 2nd respondent.

2. This court is of the view that the since the application has been filed, the Authority shall take a decision on the application within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE bpr