Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Patna High Court - Orders

Munesh Kumar Mandal @ Munesh Mandal & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 11 March, 2010

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                        CR.MISC. NO.9294 OF 2008
    1.      MUNESH KUMAR MANDAL @ MUNESH MANDAL, SON OF
            KUSHESHWAR MANDAL
    2.      SATISH KR. MANDAL @ SATISH MANDAL, SON OF AHESHWAR
            MANDAL
    3.      DHARMESH KR. MANDAL @ DHARMESH MANDAL, SON OF
            KUSHESHWAR MANDAL
    4.      MANISH KR. MANDAL @ MANISH MANDAL, SON OF
            KUSHESHWAR MANDAL
    5.      RAJNISH KUMAR @ RAJNISH MANDAL, SON OF ASHESHWAR
            MANDAL
    6.      RUPESH KR. MANDAL @ RUPESH MANDAL, SON OF CHANDRA
            SHEKHAR MANDAL
    7.      RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJIV MANDAL, SON OF SHIVNATH MANDAL
    8.      KUSHESHWAR MANDAL, SON OF LATE SUKHADEO MANDAL
    9.      RANJEET MANDAL, SON OF LAE SAHDEO MANDAL
    10.     RAM TAHAL MANDAL, SON OF LATE SAHDEO MANDAL
    11.     AMIT KR. MANDAL @ AMIT MANDAL @ RAJ KUMAR MANDAL, SON
            OF LATE RAMDEO MANDAL
    12.     CHUNNILAL PASWAN, SON OF LATE NARAYAN PASWAN,
    ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BALAHA, POLICE STATION GAYGHAT,
    DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR
    .................................................................................PETITIONERS
                                VERSUS
    1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
    2. RAM KHELAWAN SAFI, SON OF LATE CHULHAI SAFI, RESIDENT OF
       VILLAGE     BALAHA,   POLICE     STATION  GAYGHAT, DISTRICT
       MUZAFFARPUR
    ............................................................................OPPOSITE PARTIES
                                 ********


2      11/03/2010

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioners have challenged the order taking cognizance passed in Complaint Case No. 2058 of 2006 by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur.

The Court below has taken into account the complaint petition and the evidence of PWs 1, 2, 3 and 4 who have come forth to support the complaint and 2 passed the order taking cognizance.

I do not find any illegality in the order impugned.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

Anand                                 ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)