Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Dilip Baburao Nimbalkar vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 5 October, 2018

Author: V.K. Jadhav

Bench: V.K. Jadhav

                                     1                   ABA 1019.2018.odt

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD

      ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1019 OF 2018


                DILIP BABURAO NIMBALKAR 
                            VERSUS
           THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
                                ...
        Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Patil Vinod Prakash 
             APP for Respondents:  Mr. V M Kagne
                                ...
                   CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J.
                    Dated: October 05, 2018
                                ...
     PER COURT :-

     1.        The   applicant   is   seeking   pre-arrest   bail   in

     connection   with   crime   No.I-65  of   2018  registered   with

     Kotwali   police   station,   District   Ahmednagar   for   the

     offences punishable under Sections 406, 408, 409, 420,

     465,   468,   471,   477(A),   120(B)   of   I.P.C.   and   under

     section   3   of   the   Maharashtra   Protection   of   Interest   of

     Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999. His

     application bearing Cri. M.A. No.1536/2018 with similar

     prayer   came   to   be   rejected   by   the   learned   Additional

     Sessions Judge, Court No.7, Ahmednagar.




     aaa/-




::: Uploaded on - 06/10/2018                     ::: Downloaded on - 07/10/2018 02:14:45 :::
                                     2                   ABA 1019.2018.odt

     2.      Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the

     applicant   was   one   of   the   Director   of   Martand   Nagri

     Sahakari   Patsanstha   Maryadit,   Ahmednagar.     Learned

     counsel   submits   that   allegations   have   been   made

     mainly against the Chairman and one of the Directors,

     namely,   Vishal   Nimbalkar   and   Mangal   Nimbalkar.

     respectively.  Learned counsel submits that, except their

     relations   with   the   present   applicant,   there   is   no

     connecting   evidence   against   the   applicant.     Learned

     counsel submits that, though name of the applicant is

     there in the list of the Directors, even in the report of

     the auditor, there is no specific reference to any of his

     role or any signature on any disputed document.  There

     are   no   specific   allegations   against   him   in   the   audit

     report also. Learned counsel submits that, the applicant

     is 65 years of age.   His antecedents are clear.   He may

     be released on anticipatory bail.   He is ready to abide

     any condition, if imposed by this court.



     3.      Learned   A.P.P.   has   strongly   resisted   the

     application   on   the   ground   that   co-accused   Chairman


     aaa/-




::: Uploaded on - 06/10/2018                    ::: Downloaded on - 07/10/2018 02:14:45 :::
                                       3                   ABA 1019.2018.odt

     Vishal   Nimbalkar   is   the   son   and   another   Director

     Mangal Nimbalkar is the wife of the present applicant.

     In view of the same, the applicant may not be released

     on   bail.   Learned   APP   submits   that,   custodial

     interrogation   of   the   applicant   is   necessary   to   find   out

     his role in the alleged crime.  



     4.      On careful perusal of the investigation papers and

     after   going   through   the   allegations   made   in   the

     complaint,   it   appears   that   except   the   relations   of   the

     applicant   with   the   Chairman   and   another   Director   as

     above, there is no  further connecting  evidence against

     the applicant.   Even, the report of the auditor is silent

     about   his   role   and   there   are   no   specific   allegations

     against   him.   Antecedents   of   the   applicant   are   clear.

     Even this Court has granted anticipatory bail to one of

     the   Directors   by   order   dated   7.9.2018   in   anticipatory

     bail  application   no.   891/2018.     Thus,   considering   the

     entire aspect, I  am inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to

     applicant.  Hence the following order :- 




     aaa/-




::: Uploaded on - 06/10/2018                      ::: Downloaded on - 07/10/2018 02:14:45 :::
                                        4                  ABA 1019.2018.odt

                                   O R D E R

I. Application is hereby allowed.

II. In the event of arrest of the applicant Dilip Baburao Nimbalkar in connection with crime No. I-65 of 2018 registered with Kotwali police station, District Ahmednagar for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 408, 409, 420, 465, 468, 471, 477(A), 120(B) of I.P.C. and under section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999, he be released on bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs.15,000/-(Rs. Fifteen Thousand) with one surety of the like amount on the following conditions:-

a) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner.
b) The applicant shall attend the concerned police station on every Sunday between 8 to 11 a.m. till filing of the charge sheet.

III. Application is disposed of.

( V. K. JADHAV, J.) ...

aaa/-

::: Uploaded on - 06/10/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 07/10/2018 02:14:45 :::