Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0] [Section 23] [Entire Act]

State of Jammu-Kashmir - Subsection

Section 23(1) in The Jammu and Kashmir Pharmacy Act, 2011

(1)Subject to the provisions of this section the Executive Committee may order that the name of a registered pharmacist shall be removed from the register, where it is satisfied, after giving him a reasonable opportunity of being heard and after such further enquiry, if any, as it may think fit to make,-
(i)that this name has been entered in the register by error or on account of misrepresentation or suppression of a material fact; or
(ii)that he has been convicted of any offence or has been guilty of any infamous conduct in any professional respect, which in the opinion of the Executive Committee renders him unfit to be kept in the register; or
(iii)that a person employed by him for the purposes of his business of pharmacy has been convicted of any such offence or has been guilty of any such infamous conduct as would, if such person were a registered pharmacist, render him liable to have his name removed from the register under clause (ii);
Provided that no such order shall be made under clause (iii) unless the Executive Committee is satisfied -
(a)that the offence or infamous conduct was instigated or connived at by the registered pharmacist; or
(b)that the registered pharmacist, has, at any time during the period of twelve month immediately preceding the date on which the offence or infamous conduct took place, committed a similar offence or been guilty of similar infamous conduct; or
(c)that any person employed by the registered pharmacist for the purposes of his business of pharmacy has, at any time during the period of twelve months immediately preceding the date on which the offence or infamous conduct took place, committed a similar offence or been guilty of similar infamous conduct and that the registered pharmacist had. or reasonably ought to have had, knowledge of such previous offence or infamous conduct; or
(d)that where the offence or infamous conduct continued over a period, the registered pharmacist had, or reasonable ought to have had,knowledge of the continuing offence or infamous conduct; or
(e)that where the offence is an offence under the Jammu and Kashmir Drugs Act, 2000 (XX of 2000) the registered pharmacist has not used due diligence in enforcing compliance with the provisions of that Act in his place of business and by persons employed by him.