Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Marlin Maritime Trading Ltd ( Imo ... vs Interocean Ship Repairs Llc on 30 October, 2018

Author: Akil Kureshi

Bench: Akil Kureshi, Umesh Trivedi

           C/OJA/25/2018                                       ORDER




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                         R/O.J.APPEAL NO. 25 of 2018
                                      In
                       ADMIRALITY SUIT NO. 22 of 2018
                                    With
                       CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1 of 2018
                                    With
                         R/O.J.APPEAL NO. 24 of 2018
                                     In
                       ADMIRALITY SUIT NO. 24 of 2018
==========================================================
             MARLIN MARITIME TRADING LTD ( IMO 7929102 )
                              Versus
                   INTEROCEAN SHIP REPAIRS LLC
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR DEVANG NANAVATI, SR. ADVOCATE WITH MR. AMAN RUNGTA, MS
DHVANI VORA AND MR TEJAS P SATTA(3149) for the PETITIONER(s) No.
1
MS P.B. SHETH, ADVOCATE for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
        and
        HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UMESH TRIVEDI

                                  Date : 30/10/2018

                          ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)

1. These appeals arise out of a common judgment of the learned single Judge dated 15.10.2018, under which the applications of the present appellants for vacating the orders of arrest of the Ship came to be rejected.

2. Learned advocate Shri Nanavati appeared for the appellants and Ms. Paurami Sheth appeared on Page 1 of 2 C/OJA/25/2018 ORDER behalf of the respondent­original plaintiff. Considering the issues involved, to avoid duplication of effort and consumption of Court time, we would contemplate hearing the appeals finally at this stage. Both sides agree to cooperate with such arrangement. S.O to 29.11.2018.

(AKIL KURESHI, J) (UMESH TRIVEDI, J) PRAVIN KARUNAN Page 2 of 2