Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 15]

Chattisgarh High Court

Vijay Kumar Kaushik vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. 27 ... on 15 April, 2019

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                                                                NAFR

                    HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                              Writ Petition (Cr.) No.33 of 2014

            Vijay Kumar Kaushik, S/o Shri Hanuman Prasad Kaushik, Aged about
            42 years, R/o Village Tilai, Police Station Janjgir, Tahsil Akaltara,
            District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.)
                                                                  ---- Petitioners

                                          Versus

         1. State of Chhattisgarh, Acting through Secretary, Home Department,
            Sachivalaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.)

         2. Officer-in Charge, Police Station Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa
            (C.G.)

         3. J.S. Rajput, Sub Inspector Police, P.S. Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa
            (C.G.)

         4. Smt. Kanti Devi, W/o Shri Shailendra Kumar Kaushik, Aged about 44
            years, R/o Village Tilai, P.S. Janjgir, Tahsil Akaltara, District Janjgir-
            Champa (C.G.)

         5. Basant Kumar Sharma, S/o Dasrath Sharma, Ex Secretary, Gram
            Panchayat Tilai, Block Akaltara, At present working as Secretary Gram
            Panchayat Changori, Block, Distt. R/o Village Farhada, P.S. Akaltara,
            District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.)
                                                                  ---- Respondents

For Petitioner: Mrs. Meera Ansari, Advocate. For Respondents No.1 and 2 / State: -

Mr. Priyank Rathi, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 15/04/2019
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that criminal case has finally been decided, as such, the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma