Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gauhati High Court

Sabita Kalita vs Assam Power Ditribution Co. Ltd on 18 December, 2020

Author: Rumi Kumari Phukan

Bench: Rumi Kumari Phukan

                                                                    Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010019682018




                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                           Case No. : WP(C)/533/2018

         SABITA KALITA
         R/O-VILL- REHABARI, P.O. PUB REHABARI, PIN-781329, DIST- BARPETA,
         ASSAM



         VERSUS

         ASSAM POWER DITRIBUTION CO. LTD.
         REP. BY THE CHAIRMAN, BIJULEE BHAWAN, PALTAN BAZAR, GHY-1

         2:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
         ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD.
          BIJULEE BHAWAN
          PALTAN BAZAR
          GHY-1

         3:THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER
         ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. (LAR)
          BIJULEE BHAWAN
          PALTAN BAZAR
          GHY-1

         4:THE DEPUTY PERSONNEL MANAGER
          O/O THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (D) ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION
         COMPANY LTD.
          BIJULEE BHAWAN
          5TH FLOOR
          PALTAN BAZAR
          GHY-1

         5:THE ASSTT. GENERAL MANAGER (F AND A) PENSION
         ASSAM ELECTRICITY GRID CORPORATION LTD.
          BIJULEE BHAWAN
                                                                                        Page No.# 2/3

              PALTAN BAZAR
              GHY-1

              6:THE ASSTT. GENERAL MANAGER
               BARPETA ELECTRICAL DIVISION
              ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. (LAR)
               BIJULEE BHAWAN
               PALTAN BAZAR
               GHY-1

              7:HIRAN KALITA
               C/O- SURENDRA NATH
              VILL- HOWLY
               P.O. HOWLY
               DIST- BARPETA
               PIN-78131

Advocate for the Petitioner     : MS. S G BARUAH

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, APDCL




                                      BEFORE
                     HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN


                                               ORDER

18-12-2020.

Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned standing counsel representing the respondent Nos.1--6 are present.

Today none appears for and on behalf of the respondent No.7, although affidavit was filed by the said respondent.

The dispute in the present case is regarding the claim of the two wives of the deceased employee, claiming pensionary benefits of their deceased husband, to be his first wife.

According to the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1--6, in all the official documents including the service book etc., recorded the name of Hiran Kalita as the first wife of the deceased employee and there is also another dispute regarding the name of the deceased employee as to whether he is Parbananda Kalita or Sarbananda Kalita, as reflected from the various documents on record.

Page No.# 3/3 In view of the above, the relevant official records needs to be verified.

Accordingly the respondent Nos.1--6 are directed to file the affidavit-in-opposition along with all the documents/file pertaining to the deceased employee by the next date fixing 12.01.2021.

List the matter on 12.01.2021.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant