Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Faiza International Travels Through ... vs State Of Gujarat Through ... on 23 February, 2026

Author: Prateek Jalan

Bench: Prateek Jalan

                          $~82
                          *         IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          +         W.P.(CRL) 629/2026 & CRL.M.A. 5946/2026
                                    FAIZA INTERNATIONAL TRAVELS THROUGH
                                    AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE                 .....Petitioner
                                                 Through: Mr. Farrukh Tabish, Mr. Shivam
                                                          Pandey and Mr. Suryavrat Dubey,
                                                          Advocates.

                                                                  versus

                                    STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH
                                    SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE & ORS.          .....Respondents
                                                 Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC with
                                                          Mr. Arjit Sharma and Ms. Sakshi
                                                          Jha, Advocates for State.

                          CORAM:
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

                                                                  ORDER

% 23.02.2026

1. The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, arraying the States of Gujarat, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Kerala, and Haryana as respondent Nos. 1 to 6, and its banker - ICICI Bank Limited ["Bank"] as respondent No. 7.

2. It is contended that the law enforcement agencies in the aforesaid States have issued liens on the petitioner's bank accounts for various sums, however, the Bank has attached the entire accounts of the petitioner, resulting in the complete paralysis of the petitioner's business. It is specifically submitted that the petitioner's grievance is particularly W.P.(CRL) 629/2026 Page 1 of 2 This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/02/2026 at 20:42:23 against the Bank to the extent of the attachment beyond the amount of the liens imposed by respondent Nos. 1 to 6.

3. In these circumstances, Mr. Farrukh Tabish, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to the petitioner to file a civil writ petition directed against the Bank, rather than for the relief sought in the present petition.

4. The petition, alongwith pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid.

5. Needless to say, this order will not preclude the petitioner from challenging the orders of lien before the jurisdictional forums, if so advised.

PRATEEK JALAN, J FEBRUARY 23, 2026 'pv/KA'/ W.P.(CRL) 629/2026 Page 2 of 2 This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/02/2026 at 20:42:23