Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Bubbles Chabba And Anr vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 19 July, 2019

Author: Manoj Bajaj

Bench: Manoj Bajaj

                             CRM-M-9692 of 2015                                   -1-


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

                                                             CRM-M-9692 of 2015

                                          DATE OF DECISION: JULY 19, 2019

BUBBLES CHABBA AND ANOTHER                                     ...PETITIONERS

                                      VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHER                                      ...RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ BAJAJ.

PRESENT: MR. V.K.SACHDEVA, ADVOCATE
         FOR THE PETITIONERS.

            MR. HITTAN NEHRA, ADDL.A.G., PUNJAB.

            MR. PIYUSH AGGARWAL, ADVOCATE
            FOR RESPONDENT NO.2.

MANOJ BAJAJ, J.(ORAL)

This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the FIR No.336 dated 11.10.2003 under Section 452/419/341/506/120-B IPC registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Amritsar and subsequent proceedings thereon.

Petitioners had set up a compromise as a ground and this Court issued notice of motion on 26.3.2015. On 1.5.2019, one last opportunity was granted to the parties for recording the statement of complainant/respondent No.2 pursuant to the compromise. It is pointed out that the complainant has not appeared for recording his statement. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that memorandum of understanding between the parties was clear and the complainant/respondent No.2 has availed the benefit under it, but has retracted from performing his part as far 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 26-08-2019 04:44:52 ::: CRM-M-9692 of 2015 -2- as the quashing of FIR is concerned.

Since the complainant has failed to give statement, therefore, the petition for quashing on the basis of compromise is dismissed. However, it shall be open for the petitioners to file a fresh petition for quashing of FIR on merits including retraction by respondent No.2 from the memorandum of understanding.

Disposed off.

July 19, 2019                                       (MANOJ BAJAJ)
Gulati                                                 JUDGE


Whether Reportable              :        Yes/No

Whether Speaking/Reasoned       :        Yes/No




                                       2 of 2
                  ::: Downloaded on - 26-08-2019 04:44:53 :::