Madras High Court
Pandiyan vs The Tahsildar on 25 June, 2019
Author: R.Subbiah
Bench: R.Subbiah, C.Saravanan
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.06.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
Writ Petition No.17349 of 2019
Pandiyan
S/o.Raji ...Petitioner
Vs
1.The Tahsildar,
Taluk Office, Arani,
Arani Taluk,
Thiruvannamalai District.
2.State represented by
The Inspector of Police,
Arani Taluk Police Station,
Thiruvannamalai District. ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India
praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing second respondent
to release the petitioner's vehicle viz., Bullock Cart, seized by second
respondent on 17.05.2019.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Ramar
For Respondents : Mr.K.S.Suresh
Government Advocate
*****
http://www.judis.nic.in
2
ORDER
[Order was made by R.SUBBIAH, J] Petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing second respondent to release the petitioner's vehicle viz., Bullock Cart, seized by second respondent on 17.05.2019.
2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Special Government Pleader for respondents.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that respondents have seized the vehicle in question on 17.05.2019 on the ground of illegal carrying of River Sand and till date, no order for release of the said vehicle had been passed by respondents. Hence, he has come forward with the present Writ Petition.
4. On the other hand, it is submitted by learned Special Government Pleader for respondents that the vehicle in question was used for illegal transportation of mines and minerals like River Sand and hence, the vehicle was seized. He would further submit that petitioner has no previous case.
5. In any event, as the vehicle is under the custody of the http://www.judis.nic.inrespondents from the date of seizure and considering the fact that if the 3 same is allowed to be kept idle by exposing the same to rain and shine, it would certainly diminish their value, this Court is of the view that the vehicle in question may be released by imposing conditions on the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the respondents are directed to release the vehicle in question to the petitioner within a period of 7 days from the date of compliance of the below mentioned condition Nos.(i) to (iii):
(i) Petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand only) before the jurisdictional Tahsildar concerned as non-refundable deposit.
After receipt of the above said amount, the same will have to be deposited by the jurisdictional Tahsildar concerned, to the credit of the District Mines and Minerals Foundation Trust as non-refundable deposit.
(ii) Petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned jurisdictional Judicial Magistrate.
(iii)Petitioner shall give an undertaking before the respondents/authority concerned stating that he will not use the vehicle in question for any illegal activities in future and shall produce the same as and when required by the respondents and also the trial Court, failing which the respondents/trial Court is/are at liberty to confiscate the vehicle. http://www.judis.nic.in 4 R.SUBBIAH, J AND C.SARAVANAN, J gm
(iv)Petitioner shall not alienate the vehicle in question till the disposal of the proceedings before the authority concerned.
(v) Petitioner is also directed to participate in the enquiry to be conducted by the respondents.
With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
[R.P.S., J] [C.S.N., J]
25.06.2019
Note to office: Issue order copy within two weeks Speaking (or) Non Speaking Order Index : Yes/ No, Internet : Yes gm To
1.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Arani, Arani Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Arani Taluk Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District Writ Petition No.17349 of 2019 http://www.judis.nic.in