Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 15]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Sahelibai vs Mangilal on 25 September, 2019

Author: S.C.Sharma

Bench: S.C.Sharma

                  HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH: BENCH AT INDORE



                                      COMMON CONDITIONAL ORDER
                 IN MATTERS NOTIFIED AT SERIAL NO.1001 to 1024 ON THE BOARD
                                      DATED 25/09/2019
                               DUE TO NON-COMPLIANCE OF COURT ORDER.

                               CAUSE TITLES AND APPEARANCE AS NOTIFIED
                  Matters from Sr. No.1001 to 1024 are listed with office objection(s).

                        The Court proposes to pass this common conditional order to obviate
                 passing of identical conditional order in these matters involving similar office
                 objection/default.
                         In all these matters, due to non-removal of office objection within the
                 prescribed time as per the Rules, the concerned matter was placed before the
                 Registrar in the first instance. The Registrar granted sufficient time to the
                 petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/appellant(s) to cure the defect/office objection, however,
                 due to non-removal of office objection/default within the prescribed time, the
                 concerned matter was required to be once again listed before the Court. The Court
                 granted further time, by passing common order on the earlier occasion.
                         In spite of repeated opportunity (three times-(i) under Rules, (ii) by the
                 Registrar and (iii) by Court), the petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/appellant(s) has failed
                 to cure the office objection/default. As a result, by way of indulgence and last
                 opportunity, in terms of this order, SIX WEEKS' further time is granted to the
                 petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/appellant(s) in the respective matters to remove office
                 objection/default and make the matter ready for further hearing within that time,
                 failing which the concerned petition/application/appeal shall stand dismissed for
                 non-prosecution without further reference to the Court.
                        Provided, however, in cases, where the objection/default is about non-
                 service of any of the respondent, on expiry of the extended period, the concerned

matter will stand dismissed for non-prosecution only against the unserved respondent(s), without further reference to the Court. The matter would then proceed against the remaining respondent(s).

In cases where the office objection/default has already been cured before passing of this order, it will be open to the concerned party to bring that fact to the notice of the Registrar (Judicial-II), who may examine the same and proceed with the matter as per the listing scheme, if ready for hearing.

If the office objections are removed within the time extended in terms of this order, the concerned matter(s) be made returnable on the date notified hereafter.

Sr. No. Cases as per Cause List No. Returnable Date 1 1001 to 1020 11-11-2019 2 1021 to 1024 13-11-2019 (S.C. Sharma) Judge N.R. Digitally signed by NARENDRA KUMAR RAIPURIA Date: 2019.09.27 10:45:19 +05'30'