Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore

P R Haridas vs Ministry Of Electronics &Amp ... on 17 July, 2019

                                                        1
                   OA.No.170/01880/2018/CAT/BANGALORE




                 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

                          BANGALORE BENCH




               ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.170/01880/2018



                DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2019




                HON'BLE DR.K.B.SURESH, MEMBER (J)



               HON'BLE SHRI C.V. SANKAR, MEMBER (A)




P.R. Haridas
S/o (late) P.K. Ramakrishnan
Aged about 55 years
Working as Scientist "C"
O/o Electronics Test and Development Centre,
STQC Directorate Government of India,
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology
100 Feet Road,
Peenya Industrial Estate,
Bangalore 560 058                                           ..... Applicant
(By Advocate Shri B. Veerabhadra)




Vs.




1. The Union of India,
                                                             2
                    OA.No.170/01880/2018/CAT/BANGALORE


Represented by its Secretary,
Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology,
STQC Directorate,
New Delhi 110 003

2. The Director General,
STQC Directorate,
Ministry of Communications & IT (MeITY)
Electronics Niketan, No. 6, CGO Complex,
New Delhi 110 003

3. Director In Charge
Office of Director In Charge, ETDC,
Bangalore                                                       ....Respondents

(By Shri V. N. Holla, Counsel for Respondents No. 1 to 3)

                              O R D E R (ORAL)

(HON'BLE DR. K.B. SURESH, MEMBER (J) We heard Shri V.N. Holla, learned counsel for the respondents. The department representative Shri H.T. Rajanna, Deputy Director, is present before us. He produces a sealed cover indicating that the applicant has not been found fit for the next promotion. They shall give a copy of this letter to learned counsel Shri N. Amaresh who represents the applicant. We hold that this OA will not lie but then we will grant him liberty to challenge it if he so chooses.

2. The OA is dismissed. No order as to costs.

3

OA.No.170/01880/2018/CAT/BANGALORE (C.V. SANKAR) (DR.K.B.SURESH) MEMBER (A) MEMBER (J) /ksk/ Annexures referred to by the applicant in OA No. 170/01880/2018 Annexure-A1: Copy of the representation dated 29.01.2018 Annexure-A2: Copy of the reply dated 21.06.2018 Annexure-A3: Copy of the Ministry of Education and Social Welfare 26.05.1977 Annexure-A4: Copy of the Note attested copy of order dated 26.05.1977 - reg.

Annexure-A5: Copy of the OM dated 11.02.2015 Annexure-A6: Copy of the order of the Hon'ble Tribunal dated 27.09.2018 in OA No. 294/2017 Annexures referred in MA No. 24/2019 Annexure-MA1: Copy of the letter dated 16.01.2019 Annexures referred in reply statement Annexure-R1: Copy of the OM dated 19.09.2016 Annexure-R2: Copy of the Note for the Assessment Board Annexure-R3: Copy of the Minutes of the Meeting of the Level-2 Assessment Board held on 23.01.2019 4 OA.No.170/01880/2018/CAT/BANGALORE *****