Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 9, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M/S.Apex Laboratories Pvt. Ltd vs K.Srinivasa Rao on 30 March, 2022

Author: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

                                                                       C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.43 of 2021

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 30.03.2022

                                                     CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR
                                              RAMAMOORTHY

                                          C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.43 of 2021
                                         and O.A.Nos.494, 495, 496 of 2021
                                              and A.No.2893 of 2021


                     M/s.Apex Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.,
                     29, III Floor, SIDCO Garment Complex,
                     Guindy, Chennai 600 032
                     rep. by its Authorized Signatory,
                     D.Jude F.L.S.Durai Pandian                                    ... Plaintiff

                                                        vs.

                     K.Srinivasa Rao,
                     trading as WINTAAS PHARMA
                     D.No.2-4-80/7 and 8, Rajavari Kota,
                     Medical Complex, Narsaraopet - 522 601
                     Guntur (Dist)                                                ... Defendant

                     PRAYER: Plaint filed under and Order VII Rule 1 CPC and Order IV Rule

                     1 OS Rules, Read with Sections 27, 28, 29, 134 & 135 of the Trademarks

                     Act, 1999 and Sections 51, 55, 62 of the Copyrights Act, 1957 prayed for

                     Judgment and Decree:-


                     1/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.43 of 2021




                                  (a) a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, by himself, his

                     partners, men, servants, agents, distributors, stockiest, representatives or any

                     one claiming through or under them from in any manner infringing the

                     plaintiff's registered trademarks ZINCOVIT under No.487453 in Class 5

                     and other registered trademarks by using a deceptively similar trademark

                     ZINK+WIT or any other trademark deceptively similar to the plaintiff's

                     registered trademark or in any other manner whatsoever;



                                  (b) a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, by himself, his

                     partners, men, servants, agents, distributors, stockiest, representatives or any

                     one claiming through or under them from in any manner committing acts of

                     copyright infringement by using, in the course of trade, labels / artistic

                     works which are a substantial reproduction of plaintiff's registered copyright

                     under Nos.A-112789/2017 and other registered copyrights in colour scheme,

                     get up and layout for their ZINK+WIT for any tablets, syrup, drops etc., or

                     in any other manner whatsoever;




                     2/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                  C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.43 of 2021




                                  (c) a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, by himself, his

                     partners, men, servants, agents, distributors, stockiest, representatives or any

                     one claiming through or under them from in any manner passing off and / or

                     enabling others to pass off the Defendant' products under the trademark

                     ZINK+WIT as and for the plaintiff's products by manufacturing, selling, or

                     offering to sell, distributing, displaying, printing, stocking, using, advertising

                     their products with a trademark and / or label or artistic work that is

                     identical in colour scheme, get up and layout with that of the plaintiff's

                     ZINCOVIT trademark or artistic work or in any other manner whatsoever;



                                  (d) the Defendant be ordered to surrender to plaintiffs for destruction

                     of all products, labels, cartons, dyes, blocks, moulds, screen prints, packing

                     materials and other materials bearing the trademark ZINK+WIT label or any

                     mark deceptively similar to plaintiff's trademark and artistic work

                     ZINCOVIT label;



                                  (e) a preliminary decree be passed in favour of the plaintiffs directing


                     3/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.43 of 2021

                     the Defendant to render account of profits made by use of trademark and

                     copyright in the artistic work ZINK+WIT label and a final decree be passed

                     in favour of the plaintiffs for the amount of profits thus found to have been

                     made by the Defendant after the latter have rendered accounts;



                                  (f) for costs of the suit.



                                         For Plaintiff         : Mr.R.Sathish Kumar

                                         For Defendant         : M/s.N.R.Srinath
                                                                **********

                                                           JUDGMENT

The plaintiff and defendant have entered into a Joint Memorandum of Compromise dated 23.02.2022. The said Memorandum of Compromise is signed by the plaintiff and the defendant, and their respective counsel.

2. On perusal thereof, it appears that the defendant has agreed to a decree in terms of prayers (a), (b) and (c) of paragraph 35 of the plaint. The plaintiff has agreed to relinquish the reliefs claimed under prayers (d) to (f) of the plaint. Upon examining the joint Memorandum of Compromise, there 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.43 of 2021 is no legal impediment to the issuance of a decree in terms thereof.

3. Accordingly, C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.43 of 2021 is decreed in terms of the Joint Memorandum of Compromise dated 23.02.2022, which shall form an integral part thereof. There will be no order as to costs.

Consequently, O.A.Nos.494, 495, 496 of 2021 and A.No.2893 of 2021 are closed.

30.03.2022 rna Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.43 of 2021 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J rna C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.43 of 2021 and O.A.Nos.494, 495, 496 of 2021 and A.No.2893 of 2021 30.03.2022 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis