Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Anshul @ Harwansh Patel vs Uday Bhan Singh on 7 January, 2025

Author: Vivek Agarwal

Bench: Vivek Agarwal

                                              THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                 [COMMON CONDITIONAL ORDERS]
                                   MATTERS NOTIFIED AT SERIAL Nos. 1001 to 1100 ON THE BOARD
                                                       DATED 07-01-2025
                               Dated: 07-01-2025
                                       The Court proposes to pass this common conditional order to obviate passing
                               of identical conditional order in these matters involving similar office
                               objection/default.
                                       In all these matters, due to non-removal of office objection within the
                               prescribed time as per the Rules, the concerned matter was placed before the Registrar
                               in the first instance. The Registrar granted sufficient time to the
                               petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/appellant(s) to cure the defect/office objection, however, due
                               to non-removal of office objection/default within the prescribed time, the concerned
                               matter was required to be once again listed before the Court. The Court granted
                               further time, by passing common order on the earlier occasion.
                                       In spite of repeated opportunity (three times-one under Rules, second by the
                               Registrar and third by Court), the petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/appellant(s) has failed to
                               cure the office objection/default. As a result, by way of indulgence and last
                               opportunity, in terms of this order, SIX WEEKS' further time is granted to the
                               petitioner(s)/ applicant(s)/appellant(s) in the respective matters to remove office
                               objection/default and make the matter ready for further hearing within that time,
                               failing which the concerned petition/ application/appeal shall stand dismissed for non-
                               prosecution without further reference to the Court.
                                       Provided, however, in cases, where the objection/default is about non-
                               service of any of the respondent, on expiry of the extended period, the concerned

matter will stand dismissed for non-prosecution only against the unserved respondent(s), without further reference to the Court. The matter would then proceed against the remaining respondent(s).

In cases where the office objection/default has already been cured before passing of this order, it will be open to the concerned party to bring that fact to the notice of the Registrar (Judicial-II), who may examine the same and proceed with the matter as per the listing scheme, if ready for hearing.

If the office objections are removed within the time extended in terms of this order, the concerned matter(s) be made returnable on the date notified hereafter.

S. No. Cases as per cause list No. Returnable Date 1 1001 to 1020 24-02-2025 2 1021 to 1040 25-02-2025 3 1041 to 1060 27-02-2024 4 1061 to 1080 28-02-2025 5 1080 to 1100 03-03-2025 (VIVEK AGARWAL) JUDGE PP.

Signature Not Verified Signed by: PUSHPENDRA PATEL Signing time: 1/7/2025 7:25:21 PM