Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

P.A.Abdul Khader vs The Revenue Divisional Officer on 2 May, 2023

Author: Murali Purushothaman

Bench: Murali Purushothaman

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
        TUESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MAY 2023 / 12TH VAISAKHA, 1945
                       WP(C) NO. 14944 OF 2023
PETITIONER:

            P.A. ABDUL KHADER
            AGED 75 YEARS
            S/O. ABDUL RAHMAN, AGED 75 YEARS,
            PANIKKAVEETTIL HOUSE, 17/470,
            PAINOOR ROAD, PERINGOTTUKKARA (P.O),
            THRISSUR, PIN - 680 565.

            BY ADV BINOY VASUDEVAN


RESPONDENTS:

    1       THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
            OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
            CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE,
            THRISSUR, PIN - 680 003.
    2       THE PANANCHERRY GRAMA PANACHAYAT
            REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
            PATTIKKAD (P.O), THRISSUR DISTRICT,
            PIN - 680 652.
    3       THE SECRETARY
            PANANCHERRY GRAMA PANACHAYAT,
            PATTIKKAD (P.O), THRISSUR DISTRICT,
            PIN - 680 652.



            SRI. SANTHOSH P. PODUVAL - SC


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
02.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C).No.14944 OF 2023

                                     2




                                 JUDGMENT

The petitioner has preferred Ext.P6 application for building permit for construction of a commercial building. The petitioner submits that by Ext.P3 order issued under the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967 (for short, the KLU Order), the RDO has granted permission to the petitioner to use the property for other purposes as envisaged under the KLU order. The petitioner states that, while processing the application for building permit, the 3rd respondent noted certain defects vide Ext.P10. The first defect noted is "according to RDO order, land is converted into parambu for construction of residential building and construction area not mentioned." The 3rd respondent the Secretary sought for clarification from the 1 st respondent as to WP(C).No.14944 OF 2023 3 whether permission can be granted for construction on the strength of Ext.P3 order.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the light of the decision reported in Shahul Hameed V. Principal Secretary, Local Self Government and Others [2018 (1) KLT 1008], the question as to whether a commercial building can be constructed in a property where permission has been granted under Clause 6(2) of the KLU order has been considered and this Court held that where permission has been granted under Clause 6(2) of the KLU order, such permission would include construction of residential house, commercial building or even an industry.

3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P6 application of the petitioner in the light of the decision in Shahul Hameed's case (supra) and pass appropriate WP(C).No.14944 OF 2023 4 orders, provided the petitioner cures the other defects noted in Ext.P10. This shall be done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction.

Sd/-

MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE SPR WP(C).No.14944 OF 2023 5 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:-

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 08.06.2022 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PANNANCHERRY VILLAGE.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 23.05.2022 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PANNANCHERRY VILLAGE.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT VIDE NO.K.DIS-11838/94 DATED 18.01.1995.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.11.2020 IN W.P.(C)NO.25620 OF 2020. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. B10- 18646/2020 DATED 08.04.2021 ISSUED BY THE TAHSILDAR (LAND RECORDS) THRISSUR. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION IN APPENDIX-A1 DATED 16-11-2022.

      EXHIBIT P7         TRUE COPY OF THE E-FILE DETAILS WHICH
                         SHOWS    THAT    THE     APPLICATION    WAS
                         SUBMITTED      THROUGH        ONLINE     ON
                         16.11.2022.
      EXHIBIT P8         TRUE   COPY    OF    THE    RECEIPT   DATED
                         21.11.2022.
      EXHIBIT P9         TRUE   COPY    OF    THE    RECEIPT   DATED

21.11.2022 EVIDENCING THE PAYMENT OF THE FEE.

EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 20.01.2023.

      EXHIBIT P11        TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.SC3/4284/22
                         DATED     17.02.2023       OF    THE    3RD
                         RESPONDENT.
      EXHIBIT P12        TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN SHAHUL

HAMEED VS. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT AND OTHERS (2018(1) KLT 1008).

      RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:     NIL.