Karnataka High Court
M/S Nilgiri Enterprises vs The Deputy Commissioner on 13 June, 2024
Author: Hemant Chandangoudar
Bench: Hemant Chandangoudar
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:21414
WP No. 37179 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
WRIT PETITION NO. 37179 OF 2017 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1. M/S NILGIRI ENTERPRISES
A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS
PARTNERS SMT.ZEENATH.M,
W/O SRI. MUHAMMED ALI,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
KODIMBALA-574221
KADABA
PUTTUR TALUK,
D.K.
2. MR.MUHAMMED ALI
S/O LATE SRI.KAMALUDDIN,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
KODIMBALA-574221
KADABA
PUTTUR TALUK,
Digitally signed by D.K.
R HEMALATHA ...PETITIONERS
Location: HIGH
COURT OF (BY SRI. CHANDRANATH ARIGA K.,ADVOCATE)
KARNATAKA
AND:
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,
DAKSHINA KANNADA,
MANGALURU-575001.
2. THE CHIEF MANAGER/ AUTHORISED OFFICER
KARNATAKA BANK LIMITED,
ASSET RECOVERY MANAGEMENT BRANCH,
# 105, III FLOOR,
MOHAN MANSION,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:21414
WP No. 37179 of 2017
KASTURBA ROAD,
BANGALORE-560001.
3. THE SENIOR MANAGER
KARNATAKA BANK LIMITED,
KADABA BRANCH,
KADABA-574221,
PUTTUR TALUK,
UDUPI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA K., HCGP)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE
RECORDS ON THE FILE OF THE R-1. QUASH THE
PROCEEDINGS ON THE FILE OF THE R-1 AND THE NOTICE
DTD.16.6.2017 VIDE ANNEX-C. GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO
STAY THE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE R-1 VIDE ANNEX-C.
THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This petition is filed challenging the order passed by the learned Magistrate under Section 14 of the SARFASI Act. This Court had granted interim stay subject to petitioners depositing a sum of Rs.7,50,000/- within four weeks.
2. The petitioners have not complied with the interim order granted by this Court. Therefore, it is -3- NC: 2024:KHC:21414 WP No. 37179 of 2017 interfered that respondent No.3 must have taken possession of the subject property.
3. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/-
JUDGE HB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7