Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 5]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Sandeep Dubey vs State Of Chhatisgarh . on 16 September, 2014

Bench: Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman

                              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                               CIVIL    APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                              CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 8906-8932 OF 2014
                  [ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) NOS. 15882-15908 OF 2011]

       SANDEEP DUBEY & OTHERS                            ...   APPELLANT(s)

                                       Versus

           STATE OF CHHATISGARH AND OTHERS         ... RESPONDENT(s)
                                   WITH
                           CIVIL APPEAL NOS.8936-8940 OF 2014
              [ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) NOS. 15909-15913 OF 2011]

       JAGDISH RAM GOSWAMI & OTHERS                      ...   APPELLANT(s)

                                       Versus

           YOGEBDRA NATH PANDEY & OTHERS           ... RESPONDENT(s)
                                    WITH
                       CIVIL APPEAL Nos.8941-8945 OF 2014
            [ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) NOS. 15914-15918 OF 2011]

       KRIPA SHANKAR MISHRA & OTHERS                     ...   APPELLANT(s)

                                       Versus

           YOGENDRA NATH PANDEY AND OTHERS         ... RESPONDENT(s)
                                   WITH
                           CIVIL APPEAL NO.8947 OF 2014
                  [ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) NO. 25414 OF 2011]

       BHUWAN SINHA & OTHERS                             ...   APPELLANT(s)

                                       Versus
Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
Pardeep Kumar
Date: 2015.03.26
           STATE OF CHHATISGARH AND OTHERS
14:27:50 IST
Reason:
                                                         ...   RESPONDENT(s)
                                  : 2 :

                           WITH
                 CIVIL APPEAL NO.8948 OF 2014
        [ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) NO. 1076 OF 2012]

MALKHAM VERMA & OTHERS                                      ...   APPELLANT(s)

                              Versus

 BHAGIRATHI BAGHEL AND OTHERS                               ...   RESPONDENT(s)



                         O    R    D    E    R


              Leave granted.

   2.         After hearing learned senior counsel and

   counsel     for the parties, we are of the view that

   matter needs to be reheard by the High Court after

   present         appellants                are        impleaded              as

   party-respondents.             The   hearing         to        the   present

   appellants     is     necessary          as   we   are    informed        that

   they   were    duly       selected        for      the    post       of   Head

   Master, Middle School after clearing departmental

   limit examination.

   3.         In view of the above, it is not necessary

   to examine other issues raised in the appeals.

   4.         Civil Appeals are allowed as above.                            The

   impugned      order       is   set-aside.          Writ Petitions (C)
                      : 3 :



Nos. 4012, 4239,4581,4640,4686,4818,4819,4876,4859

4891, 4919,5291,5351,5476,5496,5693,5761,5762,5997,

5996, 5536,5881,5979,5980,5985,5998 of 2010 and 215

of 2011 are restored to the file of the High Court

of Chhattisgarh for fresh hearing and consideration

in accordance with law after impleadment of the

present appellants as party-respondents.

5.       Applicants in I.A. Nos. 137-163 of 2013 in

civil appeal Nos. 8906-8932 of 2014 may apply to

the High Court for their impleadment/intervention.

It will be open to the parties to bring to the

notice of the High Court the events that have taken

place   subsequent   to    the   filing   of   the   writ

petitions.


                          ......................CJI.
                          (R.M. LODHA)


                           ........................J.
                          (KURIAN JOSEPH)


NEW DELHI;                 ........................J.
SEPTEMBER 16, 2014        (ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN)
ITEM NO.8                 COURT NO.1                SECTION IVA

                S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)     No(s).
15882-15908/2011

SANDEEP DUBEY & ORS.                                  Petitioner(s)

                                  VERSUS

STATE OF CHHATISGARH & ORS.                           Respondent(s)
(with interim relief and office report)

WITH
SLP(C) No. 15909-15913/2011
(With interim relief and Office Report)
 SLP(C) No. 15914-15918/2011
(With interim relief and Office Report)
 SLP(C) No. 25414/2011
(With office Report)
 SLP(C) No. 1076/2012
(With interim relief and Office Report)

Date : 16/09/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :
          HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

For Petitioner(s)
SLP 15882-15908,
25414               Mr.Fakhruddin, Sr. Adv.
                    Mr.Raj Kishor Choudhary, Adv.
                    Ms. Neeru Sharma, Adv.
                    Ms. Sadaf Rehman, Adv.
                    Ms. Meenu, Adv. for
                    Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv.

SLP 15909-15913,
15914-15918         Mr. Mishra Saurabh,Adv.
                    Ms. Vanshaja Shukla, Adv.
                    Mr. Ankit Kr. Lal, Adv.

For Respondent(s)   Mr. C. D. Singh,Adv.

                    Mr.   Santosh Paul, Adv.
                    Mr.   Arvind Gupta, Adv.
                    Mr.   Harish Pandey,Adv.
                    Mr.   Debopriyo Pal, Adv.
                   : 2 :


             Mr. Navin Prakash,Adv.

             Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar,Adv.
             Ms. Swati Jaiswal, Adv.

             Mr. Akshat Shrivastava, Adv. for
             Ms. Manjeet Kirpal,Adv.

             Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha,Adv.

             Mr.   Apoorv Kurup,Adv.
             Mr.   Aniruddha P. Mayee,Adv.
             Mr.   Rohit Rathi,Adv.
             Mr.   V.C. Shukla, Adv.

   UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                      O R D E R

Leave granted.

Civil Appeals are allowed in terms of signed order. No costs. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.





   (PARDEEP KUMAR)                       (RENU DIWAN)
      AR-cum-PS                          COURT MASTER

[SIGNED ORDER IS PLACED ON THE FILE]