Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

V.Rajasekaran vs The Chairman on 9 January, 2018

Author: S.M.Subramaniam

Bench: S.M.Subramaniam

        

 

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT               

DATED: 09.01.2018               

CORAM   

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE  S.M.SUBRAMANIAM             

W.P.(MD)Nos.14098 of 2009 and 8624 of 2009   
and 
M.P.(MD)Nos. 1,1,2 and 2 of 2009 


W.P.(MD)No.14098 of 2009:  

V.Rajasekaran                                                    ... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Chairman, 
   Tamilnadu Electricity Board,
   Anna Salai, Chennai ? 600 002.

2.The District Employment Officer,
   Thoothukudi District,
   Thoothukudi.                                                 ... Respondents

                                                        
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India,
to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to strictly follow
the employment seniority-cum-communal rotation for filling up of the
remaining and future vacancies in the cadre of Technical Assistant in Tamil
Nadu Electricity Board by following the due selection process till then not
to fill up the post of Technical Assistant and consequently directing him to
appoint the petitioner as Technical Assistant based on the employment
seniority within the time limit that may be stipulated by this  Court.

!For Petitioner :  Mr.R.V.Rajkumar 
^For R1                 :  Mr.V.Kasinathan
                 For R2         :  Ms.V.P.M.Vaishnavi 
                                        Government Advocate  


W.P.(MD)No.8624 of 2009:  

V.Premkumar                                                      ... Petitioner      
Vs.
1.The Chairman, 
   Tamilnadu Electricity Board,
   Anna Salai, Chennai ? 600 002.

2.The Director,
   Board of Apprenticeship Training,
   Taramani, Chennai-600 113.

3.The District Employment Officer,
   Thoothukudi District,
   Thoothukudi. 

4.The Assistant Director,
   Professional & Executive Employment Office,
   Santhome, Chennai ? 600 004.                         ... Respondents        

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India,
to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to strictly follow
the employment seniority-cum-communal roaster for filling up of the remaining
and future vacancies in the cadre of Technical Assistant in Tamilnadu
Electricity Board by following the due selection process till then not to
fill up the post of Technical Assistants and consequently consider the case
of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Technical Assistant based on
his Educational qualification and Employment seniority within the time limit
that may be stipulated by this Court.
                
                For Petitioner  :  Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu                 
                
                For R1 & R2     :  Mr.V.Kasinathan              

                For R3 & R4     :  Ms.V.P.M.Vaishnavi 
                                        Government Advocate     


:COMMON ORDER      

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners made a submission that the first respondent, Tamilnadu Electricity Board had not followed the employment Seniority-cum-Communal Roaster for filling up the post of Technical Assistants.

2. However, the Rules relating to the selection to the post of Technical Assistants underwent changes and now the post of Technical Assistants have to be filled up through open competition process by following the procedure and the Rules of reservations and the other recruitment Rules in force. Now the writ petitioners have to submit an application in the event of issuing any recruitment notification and participate in the process of selection and get themselves selected. In other words, it is left open to the petitioners to participate in the process of selection in accordance with law. However, the earlier participation in selection will not confer any right to the writ petitioners to seek appointment order.

3. Under these circumstances, the relief sought for in these writ petitions as such need not be considered in view of the changed Recruitment Rules.

4. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions stand closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

To

1.The Director, Board of Apprenticeship Training, Taramani, Chennai-600 113.

2.The District Employment Officer, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

3.The Assistant Director, Professional & Executive Employment Office, Santhome, Chennai ? 600 004.

.