Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Employees Provident Fund Organization ... vs Ajay Chandra on 10 April, 2018

Bench: Arun Mishra, Uday Umesh Lalit

                                                            1

     ITEM NO.5                                   COURT NO.10                        SECTION XVI-A

                                      S U P R E M E C O U R T O F               I N D I A
                                              RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Transfer Petition (Civil) No(s).2302-2342/2017

     EMPLOYEES” PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION (EPFO)
     ETC.ETC.                                                                          Petitioner(s)

                                                           VERSUS

     AJAY CHANDRA ETC.ETC.                                                             Respondent(s)
     ((With appln.(s) for stay)

     Date : 10-04-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA
                           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT


     For Petitioner(s)                    Mr.   R.M. Sharma,dv.
                                          Mr.   Sanjay K. Shandilya,Adv.
                                          Mr.   Apoorva Agrawal,Adv.
                                          Mr.   Mushtaq Ahmad,AOR

     For Respondent(s)                    Mr.   Rajesh Gupta,Adv.
                                          Mr.   Harpreet Singh,Adv.
                                          Mr.   Sumit R. Sharma,AOR
                                          Mr.   Pranjal Saran,Adv.
                                          Mr.   Ajay Chandra,Adv.


                            UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                               O R D E R

1. It is stated that since Kerala High Court has reserved the judgment and has not decided it so far inspite of our request made on 20.12.2017.

2. It is stated by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents that in Delhi High Court, additional question has been raised with respect to the Notification Signature Not Verified dated 31.5.2017.

Digitally signed by BALA PARVATHI Date: 2018.04.11 15:28:21 IST Reason:

3. In the circumstances, we vacate the interim stay granted on 15.12.2017 and request the concerned High Courts to deal with the matters on merits and not to await the decision of the Kerala High Court.

2

4. The transfer petitions and all pending applications are accordingly disposed of.





     (Sarita Purohit)                (Jagdish Chander)
       Court master                   Branch Officer