Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Troikaa Pharmaceuticals Limited vs Respondent(S) on 9 March, 2016

Author: Abhilasha Kumari

Bench: Abhilasha Kumari

                  O/COMP/17/2016                                              ORDER




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                            COMPANY PETITION NO. 17 of 2016

                       In COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 334 of 2015
                                            With
                            COMPANY PETITION NO. 18 of 2016
                                              In
                         COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 333 of 2015
         ==========================================================
                  TROIKAA PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED....Petitioner(s)
                                       Versus
                                ......Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MRS SWATI SOPARKAR, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
         MR KSHITIJ AMIN FOR MR DEVANG VYAS, ADVOCATE for the
         Respondent(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

          CORAM: HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE ABHILASHA KUMARI

                                     Date : 09/03/2016


                                   COMMON ORAL ORDER

1.   These   petitions   are   filed   by   two   companies,   for   the  purpose   of   obtaining   the   sanction   of   this   Court   to   a  Composite   Scheme   of   Arrangement,   in   the   nature   of  transfer   of   the   Windmill   Undertaking   of   Troikaa  Pharmaceuticals   Limited   to   Troikaa   Exports   Private  Limited,   amalgamation   of   the   residue   undertaking   of  Troikaa   Pharmaceuticals   Limited   to   Troikaa   Exports  Private Limited and restructure of the share capital of  Page 1 of 14 HC-NIC Page 1 of 14 Created On Wed Apr 06 02:05:52 IST 2016 O/COMP/17/2016 ORDER Troikaa Exports Private Limited, the Transferee Company,  proposed under Sections 391 to 394 read with Sections 100  to 103 of the Companies Act, 1956. 

2. It has been submitted that both the companies in  the   proposed   Scheme   belong   to   the   same   group   of  management viz. Troikaa group. Troikaa Pharmaceuticals  Limited, the Transferor Company is mainly engaged in  business   of   manufacturing   and   sale,   trading,   and  export   of   various   generic   drug   formulations,  manufacture of drugs and pharmaceutical products. It  is   also   engaged   in   development   of   medicines   in   the  therapeutic   areas   of   Pain   management,   Gynecology,  Nutraceuticals   85   Nutritional.   The   company   is   also  engaged   in   the   generation   of   power   through   its  Windmill Undertaking. Troikaa Exports Private Limited,  the   Transferee   Company,   is   also   incorporated   for  carrying out almost the same commercial activities for  manufacturing,   trading   and   export   of   drugs   and  pharmaceuticals. It is yet to commence manufacturing  activities.   The   present   Scheme   of   Arrangement   is  proposed for synergic benefits. It is envisaged that  the   proposed   re­organization   would   be   beneficial   to  Page 2 of 14 HC-NIC Page 2 of 14 Created On Wed Apr 06 02:05:52 IST 2016 O/COMP/17/2016 ORDER all   concerned   parties.   The   petitions   provide   the  details of the anticipated advantages.

3.   It   has   been   submitted   that   vide   order   dated   2nd  November 2015, passed in Company Application No. 334  of 2015, the meetings of the Equity Shareholders and  Preference Shareholders of the Transferor Company were  dispensed with in light of the consent letters of all  the shareholders being placed on record. The meetings  of   the   Secured   Creditors   and   Unsecured   Creditors   of  the Transferor Company were directed to be convened in  order to obtain their approval to the Scheme. Pursuant  to the directions issued with regard to the conduct of  the   meetings,   after   the   due   service   of   individual  notices to all the Secured and Unsecured Creditors of  the Transferor Company as well as the public notice,  the said meetings were duly convened on 21st  December  2015. At the said meeting of the Secured Creditors of  the Company, several amendments were proposed to the  said Scheme by ICICI, one of the Secured lenders. The  said   amendments,   as   well   as   modified   Scheme   of  Arrangement, were duly approved unanimously i.e. 100%  in number and 100% in value at the respective meetings  of   the   Secured   and   Unsecured   Creditors   of   the  Page 3 of 14 HC-NIC Page 3 of 14 Created On Wed Apr 06 02:05:52 IST 2016 O/COMP/17/2016 ORDER Transferor Company. The result of these meetings had  been   placed  on  record   in   form  of  Chairman's  reports  dated  25th   December   2015.   In   view   of   the   amendments  made in the original Scheme, fresh approval from the  Equity   as   well   as   Preference   Shareholders   of   the  Company was sought with regard to the modified scheme  and   the   said   consent   letters   were   placed   on   record  with the present petition.

4.   It   has   been   submitted   that   vide   order   dated   2nd  November 2015 passed in Company Application No. 333 of  2015,  the   meeting  of  the   Equity   Shareholders  of  the  Transferee Company was dispensed with, in light of the  consent letters of the shareholders, to the extent of  99.98% in value, approving the proposed Scheme as well  as proposed restructure of Equity Share Capital, being  placed on record. It has been pointed out that there  are   no   Secured   Creditors   of   the   Transferee   Company.  The meeting of the Unsecured Creditors was dispensed  with,   accepting   the   contention   that   the   rights   and  interests of the Unsecured Creditors of the Transferee  Company are not likely to be prejudicially affected in  light   of   the   strong   financial   position   of   the  Page 4 of 14 HC-NIC Page 4 of 14 Created On Wed Apr 06 02:05:52 IST 2016 O/COMP/17/2016 ORDER Transferor   Company.   Fresh   approval   of   the   above  shareholders was sought to the modified Scheme and the  said   consent   letters  were   placed  on  record   with  the  present petition.

5. The attention of the Court is drawn to Clause 8.8  of the Scheme, which pertains to the Reduction of the  existing   Equity   Share   Capital   of   the   Transferee  Company   from   Rs.3,00,000/--   to   Rs.1,00,000/--.   It   has  been   further   pointed  out   that  the   said  reduction   is  proposed   as   an   integral   part   of   the   Scheme.   After  taking   into   account   the   issue   of   new   shares   to   the  shareholders   of   the   Transferor   Company   as   envisaged  under clause 8.2 of the Scheme, there will not be Net  Reduction   of   Capital.   Considering   the   said  submissions,   vide   the   order   dated   2nd  November   2015,  it has been held that Sections 100 to 103 shall not be  attracted. The procedure prescribed under Section 101  (2)   of   the   Act   as   well   as   Rules   48   to   65   of   the  Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 had been dispensed with.

6. The substantive petitions for the sanction of the  duly   Modified   Scheme   were   filed   by   the   petitioner  Page 5 of 14 HC-NIC Page 5 of 14 Created On Wed Apr 06 02:05:52 IST 2016 O/COMP/17/2016 ORDER companies,   which   were   admitted   on   15th  January   2016.  The notice for the hearing of the petitions was duly  advertised   in   the   Ahmedabad   editions   of   the   English  daily   newspaper   'Indian   Express'   and   the   Gujarati  daily   newspaper   'Sandesh',   dated   28th  January   2016.  The   publication   in   the   Government   Gazette   was  dispensed   with,   as   directed   in   the   said   orders.  Pursuant to the said publication in the newspapers, no  objections   were   received   by   the   petitioner   or   its  advocate.   The   said   fact  has   been  confirmed   vide  the  common additional affidavit dated 5th March 2016.

7.   Notice   of   the   petition   has   been   served   upon   the  Office of the Official Liquidator for the Transferor  company.   The   report   dated   7th  March   2016   has   been  filed   by   the   Official   Liquidator   after   taking   into  account   the   report   of   the   Chartered   Accountant  appointed   by   him   out   of   the   panel.   It   has   been  observed by the Official Liquidator that the affairs  of the Transferor Company have been conducted within  its object clauses and have not been conducted in any  manner prejudicial to the interest of the members or  the public interest; hence the petitioner transferor  Page 6 of 14 HC-NIC Page 6 of 14 Created On Wed Apr 06 02:05:52 IST 2016 O/COMP/17/2016 ORDER company may be dissolved without following the process  of   winding   up.   However,   the   Official   Liquidator   has  sought that directions be issued to preserve the books  of accounts, papers and records and not to dispose of  the same without the prior permission of the Central  Government, as per the provisions of Section 396 (A)  of the Companies Act, 1956.

8. Accordingly,   the   Transferee   Company   is   hereby  directed to preserve the books of accounts, papers and  records   of   the   Transferor   Company   and   shall   not  dispose   of   the  same   without   the   prior   permission   of  the   Central   Govt.   It   is   further   directed   that   even  after the Scheme is sanctioned, the Transferor company  shall comply with all the applicable provisions of law  and shall not be absolved from any of its statutory  liabilities.

9. Notice of the petitions having been served upon  the   Central   Government,   Mr.Kshitij   Amin,   learned  Central Government Standing Counsel has appeared for  Shri Devang Vyas, learned Assistant Solicitor General  of   India,   on   behalf   of   the   Central   Government.   A  Page 7 of 14 HC-NIC Page 7 of 14 Created On Wed Apr 06 02:05:52 IST 2016 O/COMP/17/2016 ORDER common   affidavit   dated   25th  February   2016   has   been  filed   by   Mr.   Shambhu   Kumar   Agarwal,   the   Regional  Director, North--Western Region, Ministry of Corporate  Affairs, whereby some observations are made.

10. The   attention   of   this   Court   is   drawn   to   the  common Additional Affidavit dated 5th March 2016 filed  by Mr. Achyutkumar D. Patel, the Authorised Signatory  of the petitioner companies, whereby the said issues  have been dealt with.

11. This Court has heard Mrs. Swati Soparkar, learned  advocate   for   the   petitioners   and   Mr.Kshitij   Amin,  learned Central Government Standing Counsel appearing  on   behalf   of   Mr.Devang   Vyas,   learned   Assistant  Solicitor General of India.

12. The observation made vide para 2 (c), pertains to  obtaining   approval   from   the   regulatory   body   for  business of power generation. In this regard, it has  been   submitted   that   the   Transferor   company   had  obtained requisite permissions and licenses to carry  on   the   said   activity.   However,   they   being   general  Page 8 of 14 HC-NIC Page 8 of 14 Created On Wed Apr 06 02:05:52 IST 2016 O/COMP/17/2016 ORDER licenses,   upon   the   Scheme   being   effective,   the  Transferee   company   shall   do   the   needful   to   either  obtain such licenses and other regulatory approvals,  or   amend   the   respective   licenses,   as   required   under  the   applicable   laws   from   the   respective   regulatory  authority and the power generation activity shall be  undertaken   by   the   Transferee   company   in   compliance  with the respective regulatory laws.

13. Vide   para   2   (d)   of   the   affidavit,   it   has   been  observed by the Regional Director that Change of Name  of the Transferee Company as envisaged under clause 10 

(c)   of   the   Scheme,   should   be   done   by   following   the  requisite procedure and payment of necessary fees. It  has   been   clarified   that   the   concerned   Transferee  Company shall apply to the Registrar of Companies to  confirm   the   availability   of   name   and   shall   pay   the  requisite fees for the same. However, as envisaged in  clause   10.5,   since   the   Scheme   has   already   been  approved   by   all   its   shareholders,   it   shall   not   be  necessary   to   pass   the   Special   Resolution   in   this  regard. It has also been further clarified that upon  the Scheme being effective, the transfer of assets of  Page 9 of 14 HC-NIC Page 9 of 14 Created On Wed Apr 06 02:05:52 IST 2016 O/COMP/17/2016 ORDER the Transferor Company shall be effected after payment  of   the   requisite   stamp   duty   as   per   the   applicable  provisions of the Stamp Act.

14.   The   observations   of   the   Regional   Director   made  Vide   para   2(e)   pertain   to   the   letter   dated   1st  February   2016   sent   by   the   Regional   Director   to   the  Income Tax Department, inviting their objections, if  any. It has been pointed out by the Regional Director  that   a   reply   has   been   received   from   the   Income   Tax  Department with regard to the pending demands against  the De--merged /Transferor Company. In this regard, it  has   been   submitted   that   appeals   have   been   filed  against   the   said   demands,   which   are   pending   at  different   stages   before   the   appellate   authorities.  Clause   7.7   and  clause   13   of   the   Scheme  specifically  deal   with   the   issues   pertaining   to   outstanding   tax  liabilities as well as the pending legal proceedings  by, or against, the Transferor Company. It has already  been   envisaged   that   such   pending   legal   proceedings  shall   be   undertaken   by   the   Transferee   Company.  Further,   the   petitioner   Transferee   Company   has  undertaken   to   fulfill   all   the   liabilities   of   the  Page 10 of 14 HC-NIC Page 10 of 14 Created On Wed Apr 06 02:05:52 IST 2016 O/COMP/17/2016 ORDER Transferor   Company   as   and   when   the   same   are   finally  adjudicated.   It   has   been   submitted   that   since   the  interests   of   the   Revenue   Department   are   already  protected,   as   envisaged  under  the   Scheme,  it  is  not  necessary   to   issue   any   further   directions   in   this  regard. So far as the Transferee Company is concerned,  since the statutory period of 15 days, as envisaged by  the   relevant   circular   of   the   Ministry   of   Corporate  Affairs, is over, it can be presumed that the Income  Tax   Department   has   no   objections   to   the   proposed  Scheme of Arrangement. The petitioner companies have  agreed to comply with the applicable provisions of the  Income   Tax   Act   and   Rules.   In   View   of   the   same,   no  further   directions   are   required   to   be   issued  to  the  petitioner companies in this regard.

15. Considering   the   above   facts   and   circumstances,  the contentions raised in the affidavits and counter­ affidavits,   and   the   submissions   advanced   during   the  course   of   hearing,   on   behalf   of   the   parties,   this  Court is of the view that the observations made by the  Regional Director, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, do  not have been suitably redressed. This Court is of the  Page 11 of 14 HC-NIC Page 11 of 14 Created On Wed Apr 06 02:05:52 IST 2016 O/COMP/17/2016 ORDER view that based upon the material on record, it can be  concluded that the present Scheme of Arrangement, in  its   modified   form,   is   in   the   interest   of   the  shareholders   and   creditors   of   all   the   companies   as  well   as   in   the  public   interest,   therefore,   the   same  deserves to be sanctioned. Hence the following order:

The   prayers   in   terms   of   paragraph   21   (a)   of  Company Petition No.17 of 2016, and paragraph 18 (a)  of Company Petition No.18 of 2016 are hereby granted.

16. The   petitions   are   disposed   of,   accordingly.   So  far as the costs to be paid to the Central Government  Standing Counsel are concerned, they are quantified at  Rs.   7,500/--   per   petition.   The   same   may   be   paid   to  Mr.Devang Vyas, learned Assistant Solicitor General of  India. Costs to be paid to the Office of the Official  Liquidator are quantified at Rs. 7,500/-- per petition,  payable only by the Transferor Company. The same may  be paid to the Office of the Official Liquidator.

17. The petitioner companies are further directed to  lodge a copy of this order, the schedule of immovable  assets of the Windmill Undertaking being transferred  and   that   of   the   remaining   undertaking   of   the  Page 12 of 14 HC-NIC Page 12 of 14 Created On Wed Apr 06 02:05:52 IST 2016 O/COMP/17/2016 ORDER Transferor   company,   being   transferred   to   Transferee  Company, as on the date of this order and the Scheme  duly   authenticated   by   the   Registrar,   High   Court   of  Gujarat, with the concerned Superintendent of Stamps,  for the purpose of adjudication of stamp duty, if any,  on the same within 60 days from the date of the order.

18.   The   Petitioner   companies   are  directed  to  file   a  copy   of   this   order   along   with   a   copy   of   the   Scheme  with   the   concerned   Registrar   of   Companies,  electronically,   along   with   INC­28   in   addition   to  physical copy as per relevant provisions of the Act.

19. Filing and issuance of drawn up order is hereby  dispensed with.

20. All concerned authorities to act on a copy of this  order along with the Scheme duly authenticated by the  Registrar, High Court of Gujarat. The Registrar, High  Court of Gujarat shall issue the authenticated copy of  this     order   along   with   Scheme   as   expeditiously   as  possible.





                                       Page 13 of 14

HC-NIC                               Page 13 of 14     Created On Wed Apr 06 02:05:52 IST 2016
                   O/COMP/17/2016                                           ORDER



                                              (SMT. ABHILASHA KUMARI, J.)

         piyush




                                     Page 14 of 14

HC-NIC                             Page 14 of 14     Created On Wed Apr 06 02:05:52 IST 2016