Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

A.Natarajan vs The Managing Director on 16 December, 2019

Author: D.Krishnakumar

Bench: D.Krishnakumar

                                                                       W.P.No.19779 , 19780 of 2016

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                  Dated : 16.12.2019
                                                          Coram
                                     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
                                                W.P.No.19779 of 2016 and
                                                 W.P.No., 19780 of 2016


                      A.Natarajan                            ... Petitioner in both writ petitions

                                                 Vs.

                      The Managing Director,
                      Sipcot Office,
                      19 A, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Salai,
                      Egmore, Chennai 600 008.               ... Respondent in both writ
                                                                 petitions



                                Prayer in W.P.No.19779 of 2016      This Writ Petition has been
                      filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of
                      Mandamus directing the respondent to allot a plot to the petitioner as given
                      to other employees.


                                Prayer in W.P.No.19779 of 2016      This Writ Petition has been
                      filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of
                      Mandamus directing the respondent to pay legal dues such as interest for
                      the belated payment of Gratuity, E.P.F. contribution for the non
                      employment period from 18.07.1982 to 12.11.2006 and 80 days leave pay to
                      the petitioner.




http://www.judis.nic.in
                      1 of 11
                                                                          W.P.No.19779 , 19780 of 2016

                                    For Petitioner      :    Mr.S.Varadarajulu
                                                            (in both writ petitions)


                                    For Respondents     : Mr.Sudarshanasundar
                                                          (in both writ petitions)


                                                            ORDER

These writ petitions have been filed for directing the respondent to allot a plot to the petitioner and to pay interest for the belated payment of Gratuity and to grant other service benefits.

2. The case of the writ petitioner is as follows. The petitioner joined in the service of the respondent management on 23.08.1980 as Gardener and he was terminated on 24.02.1983. Against which, the petitioner had filed I.A.No.562 of 1993 before the Labour Court, Vellore and vide order dated 09.06.2000, the Labour Court, Vellore ordered to reinstate the petitioner into the service, without back wages. The petitioner also filed an application under Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of permanent Status to Workman) Act, 1981 before the Inspector of Labour, Vellore to regularize his service, as he was worked for more than 480 days, within 24 calendar months and the same was allowed on 18.03.2002. http://www.judis.nic.in 2 of 11 W.P.No.19779 , 19780 of 2016 2.1 Against the above said order dated 09.06.2000 and 18.03.2002 by the Labour Court, Vellore, the respondent management filed W.P.No.13974 of 2001 and W.P.No.32264 of 2002 and the same were dismissed by this court on 19.04.2004. On the other hand, the writ petition in W.P.No.24390 of 2001 filed by the petitioner challenging the denial of back wages was allowed. Thereafter, the respondent gave reinstatment order and the petitioner joined duty on 13.11.2006. However, the respondent gave employment as fresh entrant. Hence, the petitioner filed contempt petition No.1738 of 2010 against the respondent. Thereafter, the respondent revised the pay of the petitioner and fixed seniority as per the court order.

2.2. The respondent allotted housing plots to their employees for sale consideration of Rs.49,500/- and the petitioner also entitled to get the same. Though the petitioner gave representations dated 20.07.2007, 10.06.2008, 10.02.2010, 10.11.2010, 12.05.2011, 10.01.2013, 13.06.2014 and 19.09.2014 through proper channel, the respondent did not allot any plot.

http://www.judis.nic.in 3 of 11 W.P.No.19779 , 19780 of 2016 2.3. The petitioner attained superannuation on 31.10.2014. After retirement, the respondent paid only a sum of Rs.1,08,531/- towards gratuity on 13.11.2014 and did not pay the balance of Rs.3,25,592/-. Hence he sent a notice dated 30.12.2014. Thereafter, on 23.09.2015, the respondent paid the balance Gratuity amount belatedly. Hence, the petitioner filed these writ petitions for direction to the respondent to allot a plot to him and to pay interest for the belated payment of Gratuity and to grant other service benefits.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner had raised the following claims.

i) The petitioner had put service of 23 years and 8 months from 24.02.1983 to 07.11.2006 in the respondent management and for the above said period, 759 days of Earned Leave shall be given credit to his account.
ii) For the above said period, Employer Contribution to the Provident Fund is also to be paid to the petitioner by the respondent.
iii) The respondent shall allot a plot to the petitioner.
iv) Interest at the rate of 10% shall be paid for the belated payment of Gratuity amount.

http://www.judis.nic.in 4 of 11 W.P.No.19779 , 19780 of 2016

4. With regard to the above submissions, the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent submitted the following reply.

i) The petitioner was actually on duty from 13.11.2006 and hence his request for computation of earned leave from 18.07.1982 does not arise. The encashment of Earned Leave computed from 13.11.2006 to 31.10.2014 was already paid to the petitioner.

ii) No EPF subscription was deducted from the salary of the petitioner, since he was not regularized at that time and hence, EPF contribution for the period of non-employment i.e. from 18.07.1982 to 12.11.2006 does not arise.

iii) No plot was allotted to any of the employees of SIPCOT since 2000. The petitioner made representation to the respondent for allotment of housing plot only during 2007 and hence, his representation could not be considered.

iv) ii) The gratuity amount for the non-employment period from 18.07.1982 to 12.11.2006 was paid to the petitioner on 30.12.2014. Since the non-computation of gratuity for non- employment period of the petitioner is not intentional, the question of delay in payment of gratuity for the non- employment period and claiming interest does not arise. http://www.judis.nic.in 5 of 11 W.P.No.19779 , 19780 of 2016 Hence, he seeks for dismissal of the writ petition.

5. After analysing the above said contentions made by the counsel for the petitioner and the respondent, the following points are raised for consideration.

i. Whether the petitioner is entitled to get interest at the rate of 10% per annum for the belated payment of gratuity?

ii. Whether the petitioner is entitled for computation of Earned Leave period from 18.07.1982 to 12.11.2006?

iii. Whether the petitioner is entitled to EPF contribution amount as prayed for?

iv. Whether the petitioner is entitled for allotment of housing plot?

6. Point No.1 Admittedly, the petitioner was retired from service on 31.10.2014. Though Gratuity amount of Rs.1,08,53/- for the period from 13.11.2006 to 31.10.2014 was paid on 13.11.2014, within the prescribed time, the gratuity amount of Rs.3,25,592/- towards the non-employment period i.e. from 18.07.1982 to 12.11.2006 was paid only on 23.09.2015, that http://www.judis.nic.in 6 of 11 W.P.No.19779 , 19780 of 2016 too after the request made by the petitioner on 31.10.2014. As per Rule, the respondent has to settle the gratuity amount within three months from the date of the request and if not paid, the delay period shall be calculated from the date of request. Therefore, there is a delay of 11 months in settling the above said amount. However, there is no satisfactory explanation given by the respondent for the above said delayed payment. Hence, the petitioner is entitled to get interest at the rate of 9% per annum on Rs.3,25,592/- from 31.10.2014 to 23.09.2015 and the point No.1 is answered accordingly.

7. Point No.2 and 3

In so far as the point No.2 and 3 are concerned i.e., with regard to the computation of Earned Leave for the period from 18.07.1982 to 12.11.2006 and payment of EPF contribution amount to the above said period is concerned, admittedly, the petitioner has not made any representation so far, to the respondent. Hence, the above said claims are not maintainable. However, the petitioner is at liberty to give a representation for the above said claims to the respondent for getting appropriate order, if so advised.

http://www.judis.nic.in 7 of 11 W.P.No.19779 , 19780 of 2016

8. Point No.4 The respondent has stated in the counter affidavit as follows.

" 12. .. In SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Ranipet, a layout by name Mazdoor Housing Colony in the backside of C & D Block of SIPCOT Housing Flats Colony was formed in an extent of 42 cents to allot housing sites to its employees in the cadre of Mazdoors or equivalent cadre. There were 12 housing plots measuring 3 cents each in the above said lay out. After receiving representation from the eligible employees, housing plot to 11 employees (Mazdoor and equivalent cadres) were allotted in July 2000. since the above layout is in low lying area, re vised layout was formed in the proposed Park area opposite to J and L Block of SIPCOT Housing flats Colony converting the earlier layout as park area. The Director of Town and Country Planning, Chennai had approved the revised layout, vide Lr.No.14180/2003, dated 17.12.2004 and approval No.k.t e.C.,.vz;. 276/2004. As requested by the allottees, the plots in the revised Layout were allotted to 9 allot tees, in lieu of the earlier allotted plots."

http://www.judis.nic.in 8 of 11 W.P.No.19779 , 19780 of 2016

9. In the revised layout (approved by the Director of Town and Country Planning, Chennai, vide Lr.No.14180/2003, dated 17.12.2004 and approval No.k.t e.C.,.vz;. 276/2004), out of 11 plots, the respondent had allotted 9 plots to the allottees. Admittedly, still there are three plots available in the above said revised layout. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to give fresh representation for allotment of the housing plot to the respondent and on such representation being made by the petitioner, the respondent is directed to consider the same as early as possible. 10. W.P.No.19779 of 2016

In the result, the petitioner is directed to give a fresh representation for allotment of plot to the respondent and on such representation being made by the petitioner, the respondent is directed to consider the same, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the request.

11. W.P.No.19780 of 2016

In the result,

i) The respondent is directed to pay interest at the rate of 9% per annum on Rs.3,25,592/- from 31.10.2014 to 23.09.2015 for the belated payment of Gratuity amount to the petitioner, within a period of four weeks http://www.judis.nic.in 9 of 11 W.P.No.19779 , 19780 of 2016 from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

ii) The petitioner is at liberty to give representation to the respondent, if so advised, for getting appropriate order with regard to the computation of Earned Leave period from 18.07.1982 to 12.11.2006 and payment of EPF contribution amount for the above said period and on such representation being made by the petitioner, the respondent is directed to consider the same in accordance with law, within two weeks from the date of receipt of the request.

12. In the light of the above directions, the writ petitions in W.P.No.19779 of 2016 and W.P.No.19780 of 2016 are disposed of. No costs.

16.12.2019 Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking order/Non Speaking order mst To The Managing Director, Sipcot Office, 19 A, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Salai, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.

http://www.judis.nic.in 10 of 11 W.P.No.19779 , 19780 of 2016 D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.

mst W.P.No.19779 of 2016 and W.P.No. 19780 of 2016 16.12.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in 11 of 11