Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Goswami Jena vs State Of Odisha .... Opposite Party on 1 May, 2023

Author: V. Narasingh

Bench: V. Narasingh

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                                    BLAPL No. 2163 of 2023

             Goswami Jena                         ....                   Petitioner
                                                       Mr. R.R. Mishra, Advocate
                                            -versus-

             State of Odisha                      ....              Opposite Party
                                                       Mr. P.K. Maharaj, ASC
                                                  Mr. M. Ray, Adv.(Informant)

                               CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

                                         ORDER

01.05.2023 Order No.

02. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. Learned counsel Mr. M. Ray & Associates have filed Vakalatnama on consent of the petitioner. The same is taken on record. Name of Mr. M. Ray & Associates be indicated in the brief, in the cause list as well as in the web portal of this Court.

3. The petitioner is an accused in connection with C.T. Case No.12 of 2023, pending in the file of the learned J.M.F.C., Basta, arising out of Basta P.S. Case No.7 of 2023, for alleged commission of offences under Sections 291/341/323/376(2)(n)/506/34 of IPC.

4. Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s.439 Cr.P.C. by the learned Presiding Officer, Special Court (SC & ST), Balasore, by order dated 17.02.2023 in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed.

Page 1 of 2

5. An affidavit stated to have been filed on behalf of the informant/victim indicating that the matter has been settled out of Court and the informant/victim has no objection, if the petitioner is enlarged on bail.

6. Considering the same, this Court directs the petitioner to be released on bail on such terms to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin.

7. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

8. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rule.

(V. NARASINGH) Judge Ayesha AYESHA Digitally signed by AYESHA ROUT ROUT Date: 2023.05.02 19:31:54 +05'30' Page 2 of 2