Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Salimuddin Ahmed & Ors vs Mst. Goleahar Bibi & Ors on 30 April, 2010

Author: Bhaskar Bhattacharya

Bench: Bhaskar Bhattacharya

                                                 1


30.4.2010
 ss                               S.A.T. 88 of 2010
                                         with
                                 C.A.N. 3732 of 2010

                                 Salimuddin Ahmed & Ors.
                                          Vs.
                                 Mst. Goleahar Bibi & Ors.
                            <,




                                 Mr. Ashok Kumar Banerjee
                                 Mr. Debasish Das
                                               ... For the appellants

               The defect pointed out by the stamp reporter may be ignored.

               This appeal will be heard on the following substantial questions of

        law:

                i) Whether the learned courts below committed substantial error of

                        law in dismissing the suit altogether by overlooking the fact

                        that even on the basis of defence taken by the defendants as

                        appearing from the deed of gift executed in their favour they

                        could not acquire title to the extent of entire suit property;

                ii) Whether the learned court of appeal below committed substantial

                        error of law in refusing the prayer for amendment of plaint

                        made      during   the       pendency   of   the   appeal   alleging

                        dispossession during pendency of the suit as barred by

                        limitation;

                iii)   Whether the learned courts below committed substantial error

                        of law in holding that there was ouster of the co-sharer by

                        the act of the brothers by totally overlooking the fact that
                                   2


            such fact was not alleged in the deed of gift executed in the

            year 1975;

      iv)Whether the learned courts below committed substantial error of

            law in not considering the question of extinguishment of title

            of the plaintiffs by adverse possession in proper perspective;

      v) Whether the learned courts below committed substantial error of

            law in appreciating the validity of the alleged deed of gift

            executed by the sons of Year Ali Mollick by overlooking the

            conditions, non-fulfillment of which amounted to revocation

            of same.

    Call for the lower court records and issue usual notices.

                    Re : C.A.N. 3732 of 2010

    The learned Advocate for the appellant is permitted to correct the

description of the application for stay.

    The learned Advocate for the appellant is directed to serve copy of the

application upon the respondents informing that the matter will appear

before the appropriate Bench after three weeks and to file affidavit of service at the time of hearing.

Till disposal of this application the respondents are restrained from transferring, alienating or changing the nature and character of the property.

(Bhattacharya, J.) 3 (Prasenjit Mandal, J.)