Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Lalgee Yadav vs State Of U.P. And Another on 6 March, 2020

Author: Surya Prakash Kesarwani

Bench: Surya Prakash Kesarwani





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 5
 

 
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3723 of 2020
 

 
Petitioner :- Lalgee Yadav
 
Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohan Lal
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K.S.Parihar
 

 
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
 

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondents.

This writ petition has been filed praying for a direction to the respondent no.2 to evaluate the OMR answer sheet of TGT Examination 2016.

The petitioner darkened several circles of Geography subject which was other than the two subjects opted by him in Part - I of the OMR answer sheet.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that his OMR Answer sheet should be evaluated in the light of the order dated 14.02.2020 passed by this Court in WRIT - A No. - 20396 of 2019 (Manoj Kumar And 99 Others Vs. State of U.P. and Another).

Perusal of the copy of alleged OMR answer sheet filed as Annexure 4 to the writ petition shows that the petitioner has filled almost all the circles of a subject other than the two subjects opted by him in part I of the OMR answer sheet. This can not be said to be a human error. That apart, the final result has already been declared.

In view of the aforesaid, I do not find any merit in this writ petition. Consequently the writ petition is dismissed.

Order Date :- 6.3.2020/vkg