Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

N.J.Varghese vs The Central Bank Of India on 18 February, 1997

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY 2016/1ST MAGHA, 1937

WP(C).No. 11065 of 2005 (P)
----------------------------

PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------

              N.J.VARGHESE, BILL COLLECTOR,
              CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, ROUND WEST, THRISSUR
              KERALA.

              BY ADV. SRI.R.MANOJ

RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------

          1. THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA,
              REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING, DIRECTOR
              CENTRAL OFFICE, CHANDERMUKHI, NARIMAN POINT
              MUMBAI-400 021.

          2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER,
              CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, IST FLOOR, METRO PLAZA
              OPPOSITE ERNAKULAM TOWN RAILWAY, STATION, COCHIN.

          3. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER FOR PERSONS
              WITH DISABILITIES, SAROJINI HOUSE, 6
              BHAGWAN DAS ROAD, NEW DELHI-110 001.

          4. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY
              THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PERSONAL
              PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSION, NEW DELHI.



            R4 BY SRI N NAGARESH
            R4 BY ADV. SRI.JOHN VARGHESE, ASSISTANT SG
              R, BY ADV. SRI.M.P.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR (SR.)
              R,R2 BY ADV. SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
              R,R3 & 4 BY ADV. SRI.THOMAS J.ANAKKALUNKAL,CGC

              THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
21-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WPC NO. 11065/2005

                                 APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

  EXT.P1      : TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE MEDICAL
                BOARD OF DISTRICT HOSPITAL
  EXT.P2      : TRUE COPY OF THE CALL LETTER ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER DT
                22.2.2000
  EXT.P3      : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SENT BY THE GENERAL
                SECRETARY DT 12.2.2000
  EXT.P4      : TRUE COPY OF THEREPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE
                PETITIONER DT 7.11.2002
  EXT.P5      : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE
                PETITIONER DT 7.11.2002
  EXT.P6      : TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT FILED BY THE BANK
  EXT.P7&     : TRUE COPY OF THE CORRIGANDUM OF UNION OF INDIA
 P7(a)
  EXT.P8      : TRUE COPY OF THE REJOINDER FILED BY THE PETITIONER
  EXT.P9      : TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
  EXT.P10     : TRUE COPY OF THE CLARIFICATION OF FILED BY THE BANK
  EXT.P11     : TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER
  EXT.P12     : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT



RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:

EXT.R1(1): TRUE COPY OF THE PROMOTION POLICY

EXT.R1(2): TRUE COPY OF THE BROCHURES

EXT.R1(3): TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR DATED 18.02.1997

EXT.R1(4): TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR DT 23.10.2002




                                            TRUE COPY




                                            P.A TO JUDGE

jma



                       K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J
                 - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                      W.P(C) No. 11065 of 2005
                - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

              Dated this the 21st day of January, 2016


                              J U D G M E N T

Writ petition was filed in the year 2005 and though notice was ordered on 01.04.2005, notice sent to 3rd respondent was returned unserved. On 27.03.2015 when the matter was posted, there was no representation and the petitioner was directed to take steps within three days to issue fresh notice to the 3rd respondent. Again, on 01.04.2015, when the matter was posted, the counsel for the petitioner sought time and it was directed that substitute steps be taken on or before 08.04.2015. Till date no steps have been taken. Today, when the matter was called, there was no appearance for the petitioner. Writ petition would stand dismissed.

Sd/-

(K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge