Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

M/S Goverdhan Transformer Udyog (P) Ltd vs Cce, Kanpur on 12 April, 2013

        

 


       IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

West Block No. 2, R.K. Puram, New Delhi  110 066.





		Date of Hearing :  12.4.2013

                     

Service Tax Appeal No. 3064 of 2012 

[Arising out of Order-in-Original No. 02 & 03/ST/Commissioner/2012  dated 30.4.2012  passed by the Commissioner , Central Excise & Service Tax, Kanpur]



For Approval & Signature :



Honble Mr. Justice G. Raghuram, President

Honble Mr. Sahab Singh, Member (Technical)



1.
Whether Press Reporter may be allowed to see the Order for publication as per Rule 27 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982?

2.
Whether it would be released under Rule 27 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 for publication in any authoritative report or not?

3.
Whether their Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the order?

4.
Whether order is to be circulated to the Department Authorities?



M/s Goverdhan Transformer Udyog (P) Ltd.                                         Appellant



Vs.



CCE, Kanpur                                                                                 Respondent

Appearance:

None								-  for the appellant 

                                               

Shri Govind Dixit, D.R.  				-  for the respondent



 						                                

Coram : Honble Mr. Justice G. Raghuram, President Honble Mr. Sahab Singh, Member (Technical) F. Order No. 56113/2013 dated 12.4.2013 Per Justice G. Raghuram :

Vide the order in the stay application, dated 19.3.2013, in presence of the consultant Shri Dharmendra Srivastava, the substantive appeal is directed to be listed today for hearing. Notice of the date for final hearing is given in the presence of the appellant/consultant. Today, when the appeal is called for final hearing nobody appears. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant, the appeal is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Justice G. Raghuram) President (Sahab Singh) Member (Technical) RM 1