Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Vinita vs State Of Haryana on 22 March, 2022

Author: Manoj Bajaj

Bench: Manoj Bajaj

CRM-M-54178-2021 (O&M)                                                 1

217
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                       AT CHANDIGARH

                                         CRM-M-54178-2021 (O&M)
                                         Date of Decision:22.03.2022

Vinita
                                                                .. Petitioner
             Vs.

State of Haryana
                                                              ..Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ BAJAJ

Present:     Mr. Jagatvir Dhindsa, Advocate for
             Mr. Preetinder Singh Ahluwalia, Advocate for the petitioner.

              Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, DAG, Haryana.
                              ...
Manoj Bajaj, J. (Oral)

Petitioner has approached this Court under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure to seek anticipatory bail in a case FIR No.400 dated 07.09.2020 registered under Sections 307, 120-B and 34 IPC and Section 25(1-b)(a) Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station Palam Vihar, District Gurugram, who apprehends her arrest at the hands of Police.

On 23.12.2021, this Court had passed the following order:

"Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the order dated 30.11.2021 (Annexure P-9) passed by this Court in CRM-M-26736-2021, whereby concession of pre-arrest bail has been granted to the co-accused and contends that the case of the petitioner is at par with the said co-accused.
Notice of motion for 22.03.2022.
Meanwhile, the petitioner shall join the investigation and would come present as and when called for and in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be admitted to interim bail on her furnishing personal and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions as specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C "

Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that in compliance of the above order, the petitioner associated herself in the investigation and 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 24-03-2022 00:12:25 ::: CRM-M-54178-2021 (O&M) 2 cooperated during interrogation.

Learned State counsel, who is instructed by SI Sulinder, states that indeed the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for custodial interrogation for the time being.

Considering above, the petition is allowed and the interim bail granted by this Court vide order dated 23.12.2021 is made absolute.




                                                         (MANOJ BAJAJ)
22.03.2022                                                  JUDGE
Jasmine Kaur




               Whether speaking/reasoned               Yes No
               Whether reportable                      Yes No




                                  2 of 2
               ::: Downloaded on - 24-03-2022 00:12:26 :::