Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Sobran Singh on 3 November, 2017

                                                 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                             WA-135-2017
                                                            (THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Vs SOBRAN SINGH)




                                                                                                     sh
                                5




                                                                                                e
                                Jabalpur, Dated : 03-11-2017




                                                                                             ad
                                          Shri Amit Seth, Government Advocate for the appellants/State.

                                                                                            Pr
                                      Learned counsel for the appellants contends that though the
                                                                                         a
                                                                                       hy

                               Labour Court accepted that it was for the workman to prove that he
                               has worked for 240 days in a preceding year to his termination but
                                                                             ad



                               still, without any evidence on behalf of the workman, a finding has
                                                              M




                               been returned that the workman has worked from year 1982 to year
                               2006. No finding has been returned that in a preceding year, he has
                                                           of




                               worked for 240 days. Further it is argued that the dispute was raised
                                                  rt




                               in 2014 i.e. after more than 8 years. Thus, the dispute suffers from
                                        ou




                               delay and laches.
                                     Admit.
                                   C




                                     Issue notice to the respondent.

h In the meantime, operation of the Award passed by the Labour ig Court, Sagar shall remain stayed. H C.C. as per rules.

(HEMANT GUPTA) (VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE C Date: 2017.11.06 Digitally signed by CHRISTOPHER PHILIP DN: c=IN, o=High Court of Madhya Pradesh, ou=Administration, postalCode=482005, st=Madhya 03:03:59 -08'00' Pradesh, 2.5.4.20=8b08d804553df19ff5378dc648d203e10f08e120c9c20505ca205b5cf060dbf3, cn=CHRISTOPHER PHILIP Date: 2017.11.06 03:05:13 -08'00' H ig h C ou rt of M ad hy a Pr ad e sh