Karnataka High Court
Sri P Nataraj vs Sri S Venkataram on 1 June, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO.7948 OF 2022 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SRI P NATARAJ
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
1. SMT. B. ESWARAMMA
W/O LATE SRI P. NATARAJ
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
R/AT NO. 181
R.V. RAOD,
V.V. PURAM
BENGALURU 560004
2. SRI N. MANJUNATH
S/O LATE SRI P. NATARAJ
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R/AT NO. 181
R.V. RAOD,
V.V. PURAM
BENGALURU 560004
3. SRI P.N. VISHWANATH REDDY
S/O LATE SRI P NATARAJ
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
R/AT NO. 181
R.V. RAOD,
V.V. PURAM
BENGALURU 560004
2
4. SMT N. USHA
D/O LATE SRI. P NATARAJ
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
R/AT NO. 181
R.V. RAOD,
V.V. PURAM
BENGALURU 560004
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. NANDISH GOWDA. G. B, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. SRI S VENKATARAM
S/O LATE SRI. Y, SUBBA RAO
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
R/AT NO. 181/1,
BSV REDDY LAYOUT
RAMAMURTHY NAGARA
BENGALURU 560 016
2. SRI.S. SHIVASHANKARAIAH
S/O LATE SRI. Y. SUBBA RAO
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
R/AT OLD NO. 71, NEW NO. 46
5TH MAIN, 2ND CROSS
4TH BLOCK, THYAGARAJANAGAR
BENGALURU 560 028
3. SRI S. MURALIDHAR
S/O LATE SRI. Y. SUBBA RAO
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
R/AT YADAVANAHALLI VILLAGE
ATTIBELE POST, ANEKAL TALUK
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 562106
4. SRI M SAICHANDRA
S/O B. MUNILAL PRASAD
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
R/AT NO. 883, 1ST BLOCK
3
13TH MAIN ROAD,
ANNA NAGAR
CHENNAI 600 040
5. SRI.V PRAKASH
S/O SRI VENKATA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/AT NO. 998, THILAK NAGAR
SARJAPURA ROAD,
ATTIBELEL, ANEKAL TALUK
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 562106
6. SRI. Y.R PURUSHOTHAMA REDDY
S/O LATE SRI RAMA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
R/AT YADAVANAHALLI VILLAGE
ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 562106
7. SRI. R MANIKAM
S/O LATE SRI RAMASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
R/AT OLD MADIVALA, I MAIN
G.T. STREET
BENGALURU 560 068
8. SRI. A.V. DHANAPAL
S/O LATE SRI VENKATAPPA NAIDU
AGED ABOUT 59 YUEARS
R/AT NO.61, 31ST MAIN
TANK SHOW ROAD,
BTM II STAGE, I PHASE
BENGALURU 560 076
9. SRI R FAYAZ
S/O SRI RASUL SAB
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
R/AT NO.321, 10TH CROSS
ROOPENA AGRAHARA MAIN ROAD
4
VIRAT NAGARA, BOMMANAHALLI
BENGALURU - 560 068
10. SRI K LOKESH
S/O SRI KANDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
R/AT NO.18, 4TH CROSS
4TH LINK ROAD, MADIVALA
BENGALURU - 560 068
11. SRI P S RAM KUMAR
S/O SRI. P. N. SACHIDANANDA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/AT 201 AND 202, 4TH CROSS ROAD
27TH MAIN ROAD, BTM LAYOUT
BENGALURU - 560 029
12. SMT. AMBICA VINAYAK
W/O SRI S. VINAYAK
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
R/AT NO.152/1, 18TH MAIN,
SUBRAMANYANAGARA
BENGALURU - 560 021
13. SRI S VINAYAK
S/O SRI G SATHYANARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/AT 152/1, 18TH MAIN,
SUBRAMANYANAGARA
BENGALURU - 560 021
14. SRI D. MOTHILAL
S/O SRI DEVICHAND JAIN
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
R/AT NO.32, 2ND B MAIN
I CROSS, NANJAPPA LAYOUT
AUDUGODI
BENGALURU - 560 030
5
15. SRI SRIRAMI REDDY GANGI REDDY
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
S/O SRI GANGI REDDY APPI REDDY
R/AT PLOT NO.9, HOUSE NO. 12-4-96/2
SRIHARI NAGAR (PRAGATHI VIHAR)
OPP. BHARATHI CONVENT SCHOOL
MOOSAPET
HYDERABAD - 500 018
16. SRI S V UMAMAHESHWARA RAO
S/O SRI S V JAGANNADHA RAO
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
R/AT 2ND STREET, GANDHI NAGAR
SHRUNGAVARAPUKOTA
VIZIANAARAM DISTRICT
ANDHRA PRADESH - 531 545
17. SRI B RADHAKRISHNA MURTHY
S/O SRI B SIVARAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
R/AT PLOT NO.48, FLAT NO.404
S V PARADISE, HUDA COMPLEX
SAROOR NAGAR
HYDERABAD - 500 035
18. SMT. R R RAMA DEVI
W/O SRI B SRINIVASA RAO
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
R/AT NO.2003, 19TH B MAIN
2ND A CROSS, J P NAGAR, II PHASE
BENGALURU - 560 078
19. SRI L V SUBBARAYUDU
S/O SRI L V SUBBAYYA
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
R/AT H NO. 1-4-40
BHAVANAGAR COLONY
PONNUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT
ANDHRA PRADESH - 522 124
6
20. SMT. R RANI
W/O SRI T RAJU
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
R/AT NO. 18/1, RAGHAVENDRA NILAYA
3RD MAIN ROAD, MADIVALA
BENGALURU - 560 068
21. SMT. A M KALPANA
W/O LATE SRI MURALIDHAR
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
R/AT NO.3, SALIGRAMA,
I 'C' MAIN ROAD
II PHASE, GIRINAGAR
BENGALURU - 560 085
22. SMT. VARALAKSHMI
W/O SRI B R KRISHNA MURTHY
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
R/AT 3/15, 'CHADARI NIVAS'
KUTTI COLONY, LALBAGH SIDDAPURA
JAYANAGAR I BLOCK,
BENGALURU - 560 011
23. SRI V NAGARAJ
S/O SRI VENKATAPPA SETTY
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
R/AT 46/1, 4TH A CROSS
LALJI NAGAR, LAKKASANDRA
BENGALURU - 560 030
24. SMT. C. SHANTHA
W/O LATE SRI B CHANDRAN
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
R./AT NO.18, 4TH CROSS
LINK ROAD, MADIVALA
BENGALURU - 560 068
25. SMT B ANITHA
D/O SRI N BALASUBRAMANYAM
7
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
R/AT NO.156, 2ND MAIN
2ND PHASE, WEST OF CHORD ROAD
MANJUNATHA NAGAR
BENGALURU - 560 010
26. SRI A ANAND
S/O SRI ARALAPPA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
R/AT 1433, BEHIND CANARA BANK
BOMMANAHALLI ROAD
BEGUR VILLAGE
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK - 560 068
27. SMT. THARA ANAND
W/O SRI A ANAND
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
R/AT 1433, BEHIND CANARA BANK
BOMMANAHALLI ROAD
BEGUR VILLAGE
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK - 560 068
28. SRI N KRISHNA REDDY
S/O LATE SRI NARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
R/AT HANDENAHALLI VILLAGE
SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT -562 106
29. SRI V VENKATASWAMY REDDY
S/O SRI VENKATA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
R/AT 148, BALAJI NILAYA
ADIGONDANAHALLI
ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 106
30. SRI MUNIYAPPA
S/O LATE SRI B M YALLAPPA
8
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
R/O BESTHAMANAHALLI VILLAGE
KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 106
31. SMT. A SHANTHAMMA
W/O SRI MUNIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
R/O BESTHAMANAHALLI VILLAGE
KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 106
32. SMT. T VANITHA
W/O SRI NARASIMHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
R/AT SY NO. 50/4 (PORTION)
YADAVANAHALLI VILLAGE
ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 106
33. SMT JAYAMMA
W/O LATE SRI CHANNA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
R/AT HANDENAHALLI VILLAGE
SARJAPURA HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 106
34. SRI H R SHIVAPPA REDDY
S/O SRI RAMA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
R/AT SY. NO. 50/4 (PORTION)
YADAVANAHALLI VILLAGE
ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 106
35. SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI SHIVAPPA REDDY
W/O SRI SHIVAPPA REDDY
AGED 29 YEARS
R/AT SY. NO. 50/4 (PORTION)
9
YADAVANAHALLI VILLAGE
ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 106
36. SRI G PRADEEP KUMAR
S/O LATE SRI M GANGADHARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
R/AT KONDAJJI ANCHE POST
BEGUR ROAD, HOSADURGA TALUK
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 527
37. SMT. H Y SHYLAJA
W/O SRI NAGARAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
R/AT NO.B-4, CENTRAL AVENUE AREA
ITI COLONY, DOORAVANINAGAR
BENGALURU - 560 016
38. SRI N HARISH
S/O SRI NARAYANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
R/AT 115, 5TH MAIN
CHINNAYANAPALYA, AUDUGODI POST
BENGALURU - 560 030
39. SMT. BANDANA JAISWAL
W/O SRI DHIRAJ KUMAR JAISWAL
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
R/AT NO.105, I MAIN ROAD
NEW TIMBER YARD LAYOUT
MYSORE ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 026
40. SRI CHANDRA REDDY
S/O SRI H T RAMA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/AT HANDENAHALLI VILLAGE
SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 106
10
41. SMT. MAMATHA
W/O SRI M MANJUNATH
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
R/A YADAVANAHALLI VILLAGE
ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 562 106
42. SMT. V VIJAYA
W/O SRI RAJANNA
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
R/AT NO.1/588-1
MGGR NAGAR
MOOKANDAPALLI VILLAGE
HOSUR TALUK
KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT - 635 126
...RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES
226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING
TO DIRECTING THE TRIAL COURT I.E. THE COURT OF THE
1-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL TO
DISPOSE OF THE SUIT IN OS NO.620/2010 FILED BY THE
PETITIONERS AT THE EARLIEST VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND
ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The captioned writ petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus to direct the 1st Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Anekal to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.620/2010.
11
2. This Court is not inclined to issue any mandamus in the present case on hand. Apprehension of petitioners is that on account of delay in deciding the case, the respondents/defendants are virtually trying to change the nature of the suit schedule property. If that is so, it is always open for petitioners to seek appropriate remedy that is available to them by filing interlocutory application. Mainly because respondents/defendants are threatening to change the nature of the suit schedule property, that in itself would not create a legal right in favour of petitioner to seek a mandamus to decide the case within stipulated time. Therefore, no mandamus lies in the present case on hand.
Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE HDK