Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Allahabad High Court

Paripurnanand vs State Of U.P. & Others on 12 August, 2010

Author: Krishna Murari

Bench: Krishna Murari

Court No. - 4

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 47733 of 2010

Petitioner :- Paripurnanand
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- B. Narayan Singh
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Krishna Murari,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This   petition   has   been   filed   challenging   the   order   dated   3.6.2010  passed by the Additional Commissioner allowing the revision filed by  the respondent no. 6 against the order dated 11.5.2010 passed in  proceedings under Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act. It has been contended that the revision has been allowed ex­parte  without any notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.  A perusal of the impugned order goes to show that the revisional  court allowed the revision and remanded the matter back to the court  below   to   decide   the   same   afresh   after   notice   and   opportunity   of  hearing   to   all   concerned   on   the   ground   that   the   order   dated  11.5.2010 was passed ex­parte without hearing the revisionist. If the  contention of the petitioner is accepted and the impugned revisional  order is set aside then it would tantamount revival of earlier order  which is equally illegal. It is well settled that one illegal order should  not be set aside which in turn would restore another illegal order.  Further in the facts and circumstances, where the matter has been  remanded back to the court below for decision afresh after notice and  opportunity of hearing to both the parties, no interference is required  in the order impugned in the writ petition.

The petition stands dismissed. 

Order Date :- 12.8.2010 nd