Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M/S.R.K.Ganapathi Chettiar vs Kothai Dairy Farm on 12 April, 2022

Author: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

                                                                        C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.30 of 2022

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED: 12.04.2022

                                                      CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR
                                              RAMAMOORTHY

                                          C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.30 of 2022
                                            and A.Nos.652, 653 of 2022
                                          and O.A.Nos.99 of 100 of 2022


                     M/s.R.K.Ganapathi Chettiar,
                     Rep. by its Partner A.Sankaranarayanan
                     138, Muthur Road, Kangayam,
                     Tirupur District - 638701, Tamil Nadu.                          ... Plaintiff

                                                        vs.

                     1.Kothai Dairy Farm
                       No.7, Perundurai Main Road,
                       Erode, Tamil Nadu, India.

                     2.Sri Sivasakthi Oil Store,
                       No.224, Velachery Main Road,
                       Pallikaranai,
                       Chennai - 600 100,
                       Tamil Nadu, India.                                          ... Defendants

                     PRAYER: Plaint filed under and Order VII Rule 1 CPC Read with Order

                     IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules Read With Sections 27, 134 and 135 of the



                     1/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                  C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.30 of 2022

                     Trademarks Act, 1999 and Sections 51, 55 and 62 of the Copyright Act,

                     1957 prayed for Judgment and Decree:-



                                  (a) A permanent injunction restraining the defendant, its directors, all

                     their principal officers, staff, men, agent, servants, successors, assigns in

                     business, representatives and any other person from passing off his / their

                     goods by sing the artistic work, trade dress and color combination of yellow

                     & brown used by the plaintiff having the Trademark Registration

                     No.463167, for the logo, the packing style and overall getup of the prodcuts,

                     or any other word / words / logo / artistic work / design / device and trade

                     dress that are identical or deceptively similar to that of the plaintiff's trade

                     mark, artistic work, product & trade dress in respect of ghee, and thereby

                     restraining the defendant in any manner from passing off and thus render

                     justice.



                                  (b) A permanent injunction restraining the defendants, all their

                     principal officers, staff, men, agent, servants, successors, assigns in

                     business, representatives and any other person from infringing the copyright


                     2/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.30 of 2022

                     of the plaintiff by using the artistic work, trade dress and color combination,

                     which are identical and deceptively similar to that of the plaintiff's artistic

                     works, colour combination and trade dress as in ; or any other logo / artistic

                     work / design / device / trade dress that are identical or deceptively similar

                     to the said copyright of the plaintiff, and thereby restraining the defendant

                     from in any manner infringing the copyright of the plaintiff and thus render

                     justice.



                                  (c) That the defendants be ordered and directed to pay the plaintiff a

                     sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Five Lakhs only) by way of damages.



                                  (d) A preliminary decree be passed in favour of the plaintiffs

                     directing the defendants to render a true and faithful accounts of all profit

                     made by them, using the plaintiff's said Trademark & Copyright and a final

                     decree be passed in favour of the plaintiff for the amount of profit thus

                     found to have been made by the defendants, together with interest, after the

                     defendants have rendered accounts.




                     3/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.30 of 2022

                                  (e) That the defendants be directed to deliver - up to the plaintiff's for

                     destruction, all labels, all other print materials, stickers, signage, visiting

                     cards, letter heads, catalogues, pamphlets, broachers, all other advertising

                     and promotional material, all stationary, and such other material used for

                     passing off and violating plaintiff's copyright.



                                  (f) for the costs of the suit.




                                         For Plaintiff        : M/s.V.J.Arulraj

                                         For Defendants       : Mr.Arul Gnana Prakash for
                                                                M/s.BFS Legal
                                                              **********



                                                           JUDGMENT

The plaintiff sued the defendants for alleged infringement of trademark and copyright, damages, rendition of accounts, surrender of infringing material and costs.

4/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.30 of 2022

2. Subsequently, parties entered into a Joint Compromise Memo dated 21.03.2022. On perusal, the Joint Compromise Memo is signed by the plaintiff, both the defendants and their respective counsel. By such Compromise, the parties have recorded the terms of settlement with regard to the claims made in the suit. There is no legal impediment for the issuance of a decree in terms thereof.

3. Accordingly, C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.30 of 2022 is decreed in terms of the Joint Compromise Memo dated 21.03.2022, which shall form an integral part thereof. In the facts and circumstances, there will be no order as to costs. Consequently, A.Nos.652, 653 of 2022 and O.A.Nos.99, 100 of 2022 are closed.

12.04.2022 rna Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.30 of 2022 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J rna C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.30 of 2022 and A.Nos.652, 653 of 2022 and O.A.Nos.99 of 100 of 2022 12.04.2022 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis