Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Cce, Tirunelveli vs M/S. The India Cements Ltd on 11 May, 2010

        

 
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX 
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
SOUTH ZONAL BENCH, CHENNAI

 
E/518/2004 & E/CO/104/2004

 
(Arising out of Order in Appeal No.  220/2003 dated 22.12.2003, passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise,(Appeals) Tirunelveli).


For approval and signature	

Honble Ms. JYOTI BALASUNDARAM, Vice President
Honble Dr. CHITTARANJAN SATAPATHY, Technical Member
_________________________________________________________ 
1.    Whether Press Reporters may be allowed to see the	:
       order for Publication as per Rule 27 of the
       CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982?

 2.   Whether it should be released under Rule 27 of the    	:
       CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 for publication 
       in any authoritative report or not?

3.    Whether  the Honble Member wishes to see the fair  	:      
       copy of the  Order.

4.    Whether order is to be circulated to the		 	:
       Departmental Authorities?  _________________________________________________________

CCE, Tirunelveli						:	Appellants
 
		 Vs.

M/s. The India Cements Ltd.			:	Respondents

Appearance Shri T.H. Rao, SDR, for the appellant Shri Muthu Venkataraman, Adv., Shri M.N. Bharathi, Adv., for the respondent CORAM Ms. JYOTI BALASUNDARAM, Vice President Dr. CHITTARANJAN SATAPATHY, Technical Member Date of hearing : 11.05.2010 Date of decision : 11.05.2010 Final ORDER No._____________ Per: Jyoti Balasundaram The issue in dispute in the present appeal namely the eligibility to credit on spares and components of Wagon Drill and Dumpers used in the capital mines of the assessees stands settled in their favour by Tribunals decision in their own case in Final Order No.1836/09 dated 30.11.09, wherein the Tribunal has followed the Apex Courts decision in Vikram Cement Vs. CCE, Indore  2006 (197) ELT 145 (S.C.). Following the same, we uphold the impugned order extending the credit to the assessees and dismiss the appeal of the Revenue.

2. The Cross-objection is only in the nature of comments upon/reply to the Revenues appeal and is therefore dismissed.

  		(Order dictated and pronounced in the open Court)

						      					                      
(Dr. CHITTARANJAN SATAPATHY)      (JYOTI BALASUNDARAM)       
          TECHNICAL MEMBER                  		 VICE PRESIDENT

BB



2