Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Rupa Jitendra Deshprabhu vs Vasudev Rajendra Deshprabhu on 27 August, 2024

Bench: Dipankar Datta, Prashant Kumar Mishra

     ITEM NO.33                               COURT NO.17                SECTION IX

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                         Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.19083/2024

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10-07-2024
     in WP No.476/2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay
     at Goa)

     RUPA JITENDRA DESHPRABHU                                                Petitioner

                                                     VERSUS

     VASUDEV RAJENDRA DESHPRABHU & ORS.                                      Respondents

     (with I.A. No.184460/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
     JUDGMENT )

     Date : 27-08-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA


     For Petitioner(s)                 Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Adv.
                                       Mr. Siddharth Praveen Acharya, AOR
                                       Ms. Ankeeta Appanna, Adv.
                                       Ms. Madhura Chitnis, Adv.
                                       Mr. Naman Tandon, Adv.
                                       Ms. Shivali Shah, Adv.


     For Respondent(s)


                              UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R

1. The impugned judgment and order of the High Court has dismissed an application for intervention of the petitioner filed in execution proceedings.

2. Signature Not Verified It is not in dispute that during the pendency of the intervention Digitally signed by application, the petitioner had also applied under Section 47 of the Code rashmi dhyani pant Date: 2024.08.28 19:20:29 IST Reason:

of Civil Procedure, 1908 and that such application has been dismissed 1 by an order of the executing Court dated 24th April, 2024.

3. We are of the view that the remedy pursued by the petitioner under Section 47 of the Code should have been taken to its logical conclusion on merits instead of dismissing the application on the ground that an intervention application was also pending.

4. Be that as it may, we leave the petitioner free to pursue his remedy in accordance with law by questioning the order dismissing the application under Section 47 before the appropriate Court.

5. With such observation, the special leave petition is dismissed.

6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.





(RASHMI DHYANI PANT)                                  (SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA)
 COURT MASTER (SH)                                      COURT MASTER (NSH)




                                        2