Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Sardar Jagdish Singh vs Sardar Baljeet Singh on 24 November, 2017

                                        --- 1 ---
                                  M C C No. 243 / 2016
       INDORE, Dated : 24/11/2017
             Mr. Ajay Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner.
             The present application for restoration is filed on behalf of
       appellant, which is barred by 714 days. It has been stated in the
       application that the only son of the appellant expired in the United
       States of America and on account of some misconception, learned
       counsel for the appellant has made a prayer for withdrawal of the
       appeal. It has been stated that on account of loss of only son, the
       appellant could not file the restoration application in time and was not
       in touch with his counsel, therefore, he has requested his counsel for
       filing of the restoration application. Documents regarding death of the
       applicant are on record.
             This Court in the light of the aforesaid, is of the considered
       opinion that IA No. 3582/2016 deserves to be allowed and is
       accordingly hereby allowed. Resultantly, the present MCC is allowed.
       FA No. 298/2012 is directed to be restored to its original number. List
       F.A.No. 298/2012 along with F.A.No. 443/2012 on 16/01/2018.
             A copy of this order be kept in the record of FA No. 298/2012.



                                                    (S. C. SHARMA)
                                                        JUDGE
  KR




Kamal Rathor
2017.11.29

16:23:28 -08'00'