Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Shrawan Kumar & Ors vs Md.Usman & Anr on 9 September, 2016

Author: V. Nath

Bench: V. Nath

        Patna High Court SA No.319 of 1992 (13) dt.09-09-2016


                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                          Second Appeal No.319 of 1992
                     ======================================================
                     Shrawan Kumar & Ors                          .... .... Appellant/s
                                                     Versus
                     Md.Usman & Anr                                  .... .... Respondent/s
                     ======================================================
                     Appearance :
                     For the Appellant/s    :   Mr. Rajendra Pd. Singh
                                                Mr. Rabindra Kumar
                                                Mr. Anil Chaudhary
                                                Mr. Binod Kumar Sing
                                                Mr. Kalidura Kr.
                                                Mr. Anil Chandra
                     For the Respondent/s    : Mr. Mallika Majumdar
                                                Mr. Ravi Nath Verma
                                                Mr. Arun Kumar No.2
                                                Mr. Amarnath Misshra
                                                Mr. Baban Rai
                     ======================================================
                     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH
                     ORAL ORDER

13   09-09-2016

This appeal has arisen out of eviction suit filed under the BBC Act.

Nobody has appeared on behalf of the parties even today. It appears from the order-sheet that nobody appeared on behalf of the appellants or the respondents on the last occasion also when this appeal was called out for hearing. It transpires from the earlier order that this appeal was dismissed for default in view of the submission at bar that the personal necessity of the landlord stood satisfied as another shop house had been vacated by the tenant. However, the appeal was later on restored taking a compassionate view of the matter by order dated 29.3.2001 passed in MJC No. 1347 of 2000.

As no one has repeatedly appeared to press this appeal, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Snkumar/-                                               (V. Nath, J.)
  U