Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court - Kohima

Shri Hutoka K Aye vs State Of Nagaland And 6 Ors on 11 December, 2025

                                                      Page No.# 1/3
GAHC020007092025




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
 (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL
                        PRADESH)
                      KOHIMA BENCH

                   Case No. : WP(C)/217/2025

         SHRI HUTOKA K AYE
         PROPRIETOR M/S AYEMI FAIR PRICE SHOP, ASUKHUTO TOWN, ATOIZU,
         ZUNHEBOTO, NAGALAND

         VERSUS

         STATE OF NAGALAND AND 6 ORS
         REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, GOVT. OF
         NAGALAND, DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES, NAGALAND
         KOHIMA     2:THE DIRECTOR
          DIRECTORATE OF FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES
          NAGALAND DIMAPUR

         3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
          ZUNHEBOTO NAGALAND

         4:THE ADDL. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
          ATOIZU
          ZUNHEBOTO NAGALAND

         5:THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
          OFFICE OF FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES
          ZUNHEBOTO
          NAGALAND

         6:THE DISTRICT CIVIL SUPPLY OFFICER
          OFFICE OF FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES
          ZUNHEBOTO
          NAGALAND

         7:SHRI VITO AWOMI
          RESIDENT OF ASUKHUTO (KPA)
          ATOIZU TOWN
          ZUNHEBOTO
                                                            Page No.# 2/3
          NAGALAN

Advocate for the Petitioner : JOSHUA SHEQI, RUBICA KIHO,TUNATO
YEPTHO,R WONCHIBENI TSANGLO,KIVITOLI SWU,YEKA SUMI,KEVI
KIRE,KETHO SEKHOSE,K LILY SWU,KEDI KOSO,P MHONBENI
EZUNG,ATOKA,MIKA H AYE,CHINGMEI KONYAK,NAGALI SHOHE

Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL,




                            BEFORE
            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

                               ORDER

Date : 11-12-2025 Heard Ms. K. Lily Swu, learned counsel for the petitioner; and Ms. Inaholi, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of Mr. Veto V. Zhimomi, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents.

Steps for service of notice upon the respondent no. 7 was taken earlier. As per Office Note dated 09.12.2025, service report in respect of respondent no. 7 is still awaited.

Ms. Lily, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner may be allowed to take fresh steps for service of notice upon the respondent no. 7.

The petitioner is allowed to take fresh steps for service of notice upon the respondent no. 7 by speed post with AD within 7 (seven) working days from today. In addition, as sought for, the petitioner is also permitted to take steps for service of notice upon the respondent no. 7 by way of dasti.

Page No.# 3/3 The process is to be routed through the Registry. The petitioner after effecting service of notice upon the respondent no. 7 by way of dasti, shall file a compliance affidavit to that effect.

List the case after 4 (four) weeks.

Interim order, if any, shall continue till the next returnable date.

Sd/-

JUDGE Comparing Assistant