Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

BLAPL/378/2018 on 9 May, 2018

Author: S. K. Sahoo

Bench: S. K. Sahoo

                                           BLAPL No.378 of 2018




03.   09.05.2018                Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
                   learned counsel for the State.
                                This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
                   in connection with G.R. Case No.1347 of 2017 arising out of
                   Angul P.S. Case No.509 of 2017 pending in the Court of
                   learned S.D.J.M., Angul for offence punishable under
                   section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.
                                The petitioner moved an application for bail
                   before the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Angul which was
                   rejected on 05.01.2018.
                                It is stated by the learned counsel for the
                   petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 08.12.2017.
                   He further submits that the petitioner is a student of
                   Bachelor of Computer Application and prosecuting his studies
                   in I-Dream Group of Institution, Ballahara Chhak, Talcher
                   and he is a young boy aged about nineteen years. He further
                   submits   that     no   test   identification   parade   has   been
                   conducted to establish the complicity of the petitioner in the
                   alleged crime and therefore, the bail application may be
                   favourably considered.
                                Learned counsel for the State opposed the
                   prayer for bail.
                                Considering       the   submissions   made   by   the
                   learned counsels for the respective parties, the nature of
                   accusation against the petitioner, absence of holding any
                   test identification parade, the age of the petitioner and
                   period of detention of the petitioner in judicial custody, I
                               2




        am inclined to release the petitioner on bail.
                    Let the petitioner be released on bail in the
        aforesaid case on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/-
        (rupees twenty thousand) with two solvent sureties each
        for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court in seisin
        over the matter with further terms and conditions as the
        learned Court may deem just and proper subject to
        conditions that the petitioner shall appear before the Angul
        police station once in a week on every Sunday in between
        4 p.m. to 6 p.m. for a period of three months. Violation of
        any terms and conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.
                    Accordingly, the BLAPL is disposed of.
                    Urgent certified copy of this order be granted
        on proper application.
                                             .......................
                                             S. K. Sahoo, J.

sisir 3 4 5