Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Calvary Temple Foundation vs The State Of Ap on 30 July, 2025

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

                     (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
                WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY,
                     TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

                                      :PRESENT:

 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

                       WRIT PETITION NO: 1275 OF 2025

Between:

   1.   Calvary Temple Foundation, Rep. by its Treasurer Sri. P.L. Enoch S/o
        P. Lazarus Samuel, aged about 53 years, Occ: God Servant, O/o Sy.
        No. 77, Hydernagar, Hyderabad, Telangana. 49.
  2.    Sri. P.L. Enoch, S/o P. Lazarus Samuel, aged about 53 years, Occ:
                      V


        Treasurer, M/s Calvary Temple Foundation, R/o Flat No. 301, Vijayasai
        Residence, Hydernagar, Hyderabad, Kukatpally, M.M. District - 72
                                                                      Petitioners

                                        AND

   1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Principal Secretary,
        Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department,
        Secretariat Buildings,Velagapudi, Amaravati, A.P.
  2. The Andhra Pradesh Capital -Region Development Authority (APCRDA),
        Rep, by its Commissioner, Karl Marks Road, Lenin Centre, Arundelpet,
        Governerpet, Vijayawada, A.P - 520002.
   3. The District Collector, Guntur District, Guntur

  4. M/s. Nandi Enterprises, RejD by its Managing Partner,                 Chebrolu

        Rajendra    Prasad,    S/o.    Hanumaiah,    D.No. 1-6-1,   Main     Road,

        Sithambalagaruvu, Guntur.
   R4 is impleaded as per the Court's order dt.21.03.2025 in IA.02/25 in Writ
   Petition and affidavit.

                                                                    Respondents
        Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
         pleased to issue a Writ Order or directions particularly, one in the nature of
•■tV'
        %cit of Mandamus declaring the proceedings MAU61-DPOGNT(UAC)/2/2 020-
               , dt. 30.07.2024 passing the confirmation order by the 2nd Respondent
        uiher sec. 115 (1) & 116 (1) R/w Secs. 108,109, 110 of AP Capital Region
        Development Authority Act, 2014 as arbitrary, illegal, colourable exercise of
        power and in violation of Article 14, 19, 25, 26 & 300 A of the Constitution of
        India, apart from the provisions of APCRDA Act and in violation of principles of
        natural justice and to quash or set-a-side the same.
        lA NO: 1 OF 2025

              Petition    under Section     151   CPC    is filed      praying   that   in    the

        circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the petition, the
        High Court may be
                        \
                          pleased tb' stay all further proceedings including
        demolition of the existing structures vide order in proceedings MAU61-
        DPOGNT(UAC)/2/2020-GNDP,dt 30:07.2024 passed by the 2nd Respondent,
        Pending disposal of WP 1275 of 2025, on the file of the High Court.
              The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the
        affidavit filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court dated
        20.01.2025, 27.01.2025, 28.01.2025, 04.02.2025, 18.02.2025 & 21.03.2025,
        04.04.2025, 02.05.2025 & 25.06.2025 made herein and upon hearing the

        arguments of Sri N. Naga Raju, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of SRI A
        RAJENDRA         BABU,   Advocate   for   the   Petitioners,     learned   GP         FOR

        MUNICIPAL        ADMINISTRATION      AND    URBAN      DEVELOPMENT              for    the

        Respondent No.1, Ms. S. Pranathi, Standing Counsel for the Respondent
        No.2, GP FOR REVENUE for the Respondent No.3, the Court made the
        following;

        ORDER:

"Heard Sri N. Naga Raju, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A. Rajendra Babu, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner in (W.P.No.1275 of 2024), Sri K. Peri Naidu, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri K. Samuel, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent No.13 and Sri Sohit Chandra, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Korrapati Subba Rao, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent No.11 and Ms. S. Pranathi, Ld. Special Government Pleader (through online).

2. Pleadings are completed.

3. List these matters on 21.08.2025 for final hearing.

4. Parties are directed to file Synopsis, chronological sequence of events along with Citations before the next date of hearing.

5. Interim Orders granted in both the Writ Petitions shall continue till the next listing."

SDI- P. VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER For, \ To

1. One CC to SRL A RAJENDRA BABU Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

3. One CC to M/s. S. Pranathi, STANDING COUNSEL [OPUC]

4. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

5. One CC to Sri. V V LAKSHMI NARAYANA, Advocate.[OUT]

6. One CC to Sri K.Samuel, Standing Counsel [OPUC]

7. One CC to Sri Korrapati Subba Rao, Standing counsel [OPUC]

8. One CC to Ms.S.Pranathi, Ld Special GP [OPUC]

9. One spare copy HIGH COURT GRKP,J DATED: 30/07/2025 V4 LIST THESE MATTERS ON 21.08.2025 FOR FINAL HEARING ORDER WP.No.1275 of 2025 INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED o <_> % 3r cr» 19 WE '' fjr:-.

Or ★ I