Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 6]

Gujarat High Court

Asharam Bapu S/O Thaumal Harpalani vs State Of Gujarat & on 18 November, 2013

Author: A.J.Desai

Bench: A.J.Desai

  
	 
	 ASHARAM BAPU S/O THAUMAL HARPALANI....Applicant(s)V/SSTATE OF GUJARAT
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	

 
 


	 


	R/SCR.A/3113/2013
	                                                                    
	                           ORDER

 

 


 
	  
	  
		 
			 

IN
			THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
		
	

 


 


 


SPECIAL CRIMINAL
APPLICATION (QUASHING) NO. 3113 of 2013
 


 


 

================================================================
 


ASHARAM BAPU S/O THAUMAL
HARPALANI....Applicant(s)
 


Versus
 


STATE OF GUJARAT  & 
1....Respondent(s)
 

================================================================
 

Appearance:
 

MR.
YATIN N. OZA SENIOR COUNSEL WITH MR. MN MARFATIA, ADVOCATE for the
Applicant
 

MR
PK JANI, PP WITH MR. R.C. KODEKAR,  for the Respondent
 

================================================================
 

 


 


	 
		  
		 
		  
			 
				 

CORAM:
				
				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE
				MR.JUSTICE A.J.DESAI
			
		
	

 


 

 


Date : 18/11/2013
 


 

 


ORAL ORDER

The captioned petition vide order dated 23.10.2013 is reserved for Order. Today the matter is listed for pronouncement of Order.

Mr. Yatin N. Oza, learned Senior Counsel, appearing with Mr. M.N. Marfatia, learned Advocate, for the petitioner, states that he wants to withdraw the petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition after the charge-sheet is filed.

Mr. P.K. Jani, learned Public Prosecutor, has opposed the request made by learned Senior Counsel Mr. Oza for the petitioner on the ground that the matter was heard at length and reserved for order and, therefore, at this stage, no such request be entertained.

Having heard the learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties, I am of the opinion that the request made by Mr. Yatin Oza, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner can be accepted since the petitioner does not want any type of reasons at this stage. Hence, the prayer made by the learned Senior Counsel Mr. Oza for the petitioner is accepted. The learned Senior Counsel Mr. Oza, for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with a liberty to file similar type of petition before this Court after filing of the charge-sheet.

Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

(A.J.DESAI, J.) pnnair Page 2 of 2